Super Mario Bros. X Forums

Knux wrote:

Ignoritus wrote:Edit:
A question for Knux: why were you invis?

To stop ghosthawk from following me.

Wouldn't you need to be following me in order to "join in" on placing TNT? If you were avoiding me why would you join in on something that I was doing? Also, if I was placing TNT how could I have been following you around? How come you were already in the castle wall? Why wouldn't you just screenshot me placing TNT, and activation? I only ask the last question because it was expected of me, so it's a bit rhetorical but I'd still like to know regardless.

Knux wrote:also, pevio, how do you plan on rebuilding the meme tower? it's a very complex structure

I'm going off of memory. Since you have creative you can stock your own chests, as my screenshots of your chests are out of date. I've got the general tower part done and the "MEME" text, with cows and everything set up. I could only recall one or two signs so there's that. The rest should be easy enough since it's all just ladders and dirt paths.

lol internet fights xdddddd
I'd rather continue to post pictures of my minigame than see a fight happen

I've got too many quotes to go over here, so I'll just reply to the few that sparked my attention.

GhostHawk wrote:I have a mind to do so, but I won't. It just gives you more of an excuse to whine. No posts will be deleted until I have Danny's say on it.

That's actually an issue I would take to a forum-level but I'm not in any position to do so nor would it make sense at this time. You shouldn't have deleted posts in the first place no matter who posted it because it all contributes to the discussion at hand. Secondly, I shouldn't be the one giving the okay for you to delete posts or not, and I wouldn't imagine why you would want posts deleted in this thread in the first place. I, in no way, have any say or control over how to do your job so if you think it's fine to delete posts I have no part in that, although that's not necessarily how you should go about doing your job here, I wouldn't know because I've never moderated a huge forum before.

Knux wrote:

Ignoritus wrote:

GhostHawk wrote:There was no lava mess when I got to it.

When Knux was banned you gave me and choco permission to grief his tower. I still wasn't sure he was guilty, but since the server was being rolled back anyways I soaked it in lava. You watched. I don't know if Knux was unbanned before or after the rollback, but if it was before then that's likely what he saw. Otherwise, someone else must have re-griefed it after the rollback.

OH REALLY NOW? Funny how 8bit is unaware of this and that I wasn't informed when I asked him either.

I saw that lava mess and really had no idea how it could have happened, but if GhostHawk gave Ignoritus and choco permission to grief it, that explains something, and that is in no way tolerable and it's kind of stupid to give people permission to grief something while there is griefing going about.

Ignoritus wrote:Perhaps you should start by explaining how you had creative in the first place?

Given it by Danny. I've said this several times already.

Yes, but I took it off of you when I left.

In fact, I'm beginning to doubt if Danny gives a shit about what's going on. Despite the never-ending complaints he receives about GhostHawk, he never actually does anything about it. There is no point in telling him not to do something because he'll still fucking do it regardless. I won't return to the server if he stays. This is a total injustice.

I do give a shit about what's going on, it affects my server and, indirectly, my wallet. I'm paying for a server to be run for you guys, you'd think I would give more shits if I was paying for something I care a lot about. I'm going over what information I have, which is skewed. You can't expect me to come up with an instant, permanent result when all I have to go on is a couple of images and a bunch of words that I can't entirely rely on.

Also, I expect people to stop doing something if they are told to, else bigger punishments will be handed out. I am doing something about GhostHawk, I demoted him. If anything else happens, I will proceed with more punishments, although at this time that is unnecessary as I am unsure what is going on besides somebody griefed something and you're trying to blame GhostHawk while he's trying to claim that you framed him or something. It has, to be honest, been a little confusing when neither of you will solidly explain something because it seems to have been strewn into several different directions.

Furthermore, is there even a point of reporting GhostHawk for silencing me? How can I possibly win if he won't let me even TRY to defend myself?

I wasn't sure what happened besides him banning you from IRC and deleting one of your posts here. Both were unnecessary, but that doesn't mean he completely silenced you. Yes, you were banned from IRC, and one of your posts was deleted, but now you're unbanned from IRC and your deleted post at this point doesn't really matter because everybody seems past that. So, although both things he did were unnecessary, you can't say he silenced you. I would question his actions as it's not something I would have done in the position of a moderator, but I haven't been a moderator of a huge forums so I have no position to question his actions here.

SuperiorStar618 is my username.
And for some reason it keeps saying that I'm not whitelisted on the server, Is this why?

Superiorstar wrote:SuperiorStar618 is my username.
And for some reason it keeps saying that I'm not whitelisted on the server, Is this why?

Correct!

Also, I'd like to add:

January 5th, the server will be down for maintenance. Mostly because that's when I pay for the server and I plan on doing a couple of things at that time. It might be up way later in the day, but your best bet is January 6th. I might be a little early on this but just letting you know.

To 8bit-

---

-EDIT-
Updated the park:

Not sure if helps or not, but even thought I got permission, I never actually joined in on griefing the tower.

Wouldn't you need to be following me in order to "join in" on placing TNT? If you were avoiding me why would you join in on something that I was doing? Also, if I was placing TNT how could I have been following you around? How come you were already in the castle wall? Why wouldn't you just screenshot me placing TNT, and activation? I only ask the last question because it was expected of me, so it's a bit rhetorical but I'd still like to know regardless.

Because you found me and placed the TNT first?

And I didn't bother gathering evidence because apparently any evidence against you isn't valid and therefor MUST be deleted. At the same time, it was only banter until you decided to activate them.

What baffles me, Danny, is the fact that you've simply just demoted GhostHawk (again) instead of banning him like I currently am. He griefed, broke the rules, etc. The evidence he showed is very poor and doesn't show the whole story.
You keep saying "if anything else happens" but despite the never-ending bullshit, you still do next to nothing about it. Someone can still grief regardless of their position. And don't give me the "we'll wait and see if anything happens!" because GhostHawk is a sociopath and will likely cause more shit.

There is a very clear bias here.

Knux wrote:And I didn't bother gathering evidence because apparently any evidence against you isn't valid and therefor MUST be deleted. At the same time, it was only banter until you decided to activate them.

That isn't a liable excuse to use to not gather evidence such as screenshots. That makes your story less believable than I think you want it to, so you should have gathered screenshots to back your case like GhostHawk has.

What baffles me, Danny, is the fact that you've simply just demoted GhostHawk (again) instead of banning him like I currently am.

What do you mean by "again"? This is the first time I've actually demoted one of my staff members (and hopefully will be the last time). Also, I banned you because you have no evidence to back up your attacks on GhostHawk and your stories aren't that believable. Yes, he harassed you, I addressed that and demoted him for abuse of his powers. You, on the other hand, have griefed several different things and are attempting to act innocent, which isn't working very well for you. GhostHawk has at least admitted to breaking the rules whereas you are attempting to cover something up by attacking him just because he was following you around.

He griefed, broke the rules, etc. The evidence he showed is very poor and doesn't show the whole story.

Okay, how about you help me and explain where and what he griefed, and what rules he specifically broke. How about you give me the full details instead of an "etc."? That might help. Also, you have no evidence to go by, so you obviously aren't showing the whole story either. Come to think of it, GhostHawk has shown more evidence and has shown more of the story than you actually have, and he has contributed more to this than you actually have by giving logical answers to questions instead of going on about "Knux did this, Knux did that, justice must be served". If I didn't know any better I'd say you're framing GhostHawk just to get him into deep shit, which I'll admit you have done a pretty good job at pushing him around a bit that he got demoted, but that's not the point.

You keep saying "if anything else happens" but despite the never-ending bullshit, you still do next to nothing about it. Someone can still grief regardless of their position. And don't give me the "we'll wait and see if anything happens!" because GhostHawk is a sociopath and will likely cause more shit.

First off, I keep saying "if anything else happens" because you can't jump on a something and beat it to a bloody pulp before you have answers. At this point nothing else has really happened that has been groundbreaking, but progress is slowly being made, and you quite frankly aren't helping that much when you won't give any proof or evidence to back up your claims, thus tipping the odds in GhostHawk's favor as his side is more believable than yours currently. Yes, someone can still grief regardless of their position, do you think I not know that? As far as I'm aware, GhostHawk is not a sociopath and "will likely cause more shit". Hell, he's expanding the main town as-is and has helped not only build but rebuild, I don't think he'd go and destroy it afterward. Unlike you, who has contributed to nothing and made a mess of a tower and hasn't really helped do anything.

There is a very clear bias here.

There isn't really any bias. I'm pretty unhappy with both of your guys' actions. It must not be very clear to me, because I don't see any bias happening, so unless you'd like to point it out, I have no clue what you're going on about.

Also for the record you all should look up the definition of bias.

To Knux-

GhostHawk wrote:

Knux wrote:Because you found me and placed the TNT first?

Sorry, but I'm catching crap for not even having TNT in my hotbar. This is another accusation without evidence.

You might have just put it away before screenshotting it.

Nickname wrote:

GhostHawk wrote:

Knux wrote:Because you found me and placed the TNT first?

Sorry, but I'm catching crap for not even having TNT in my hotbar. This is another accusation without evidence.

You might have just put it away before screenshotting it.

I rest my case.

I think it'd just be best to leave GhostHawk demoted on the server and have knux unbanned for the time being. He can stay on the server if he behaves.

This is because this argument is stupid. Neither side has evidence to support their claims, and thus nobody could ever know who is right or wrong, because nobody can really trust the word of either party.

Bomber57 wrote:I think it'd just be best to leave GhostHawk demoted on the server and have knux unbanned for the time being. He can stay on the server if he behaves.

This is because this argument is stupid. Neither side has evidence to support their claims, and thus nobody could ever know who is right or wrong, because nobody can really trust the word of either party.

I've been deciding this over a while and the argument does seem to be going nowhere. I've decided on a final verdict.

GhostHawk, for abusing your operator powers, whether that was intentional or not, you have been officially demoted. I suggest you stick to the rules of the server now.

Knux, we have the littlest evidence that you did grief the server, so we are unbanning you. HOWEVER, if there is to be any griefing while you are online, you will be banned again. I have ruled out the possibilities of anyone else being the griefers, and your stories have been rather unbelievable and outrageous.

If you feel justice hasn't been served in the right way, feel free to discuss that. I'm ending the argument here, it's pointless, so stop discussing it.

8bitmushroom wrote:I suggest you stick to the rules of the server now.

Does this include not watching Knux? I can't stress it enough that there won't be any proof if I'm not able to obtain.

You'll probably see my name gray more often now since I'll be going AFK more often, or otherwise building, but I'd like to still make checkups whenever I'm not. No spawning anything, no signs, no chatting, just checking in every so often. Would me checking up less often be a way to meet you half-way on this?

it was me

GhostHawk wrote:

8bitmushroom wrote:I suggest you stick to the rules of the server now.

Does this include not watching Knux? I can't stress it enough that there won't be any proof if I'm not able to obtain.

I've already stated what will happen with Knux. If you spot anything suspicious going on, you can report it to the staff, but you don't have to watch him constantly.

Would me checking up less often be a way to meet you half-way on this?

Half-way on what, exactly? It isn't your position anymore to keep watch on things, but if you want to monitor something, go right ahead. Just remember not to stalk anyone specifically.

Knux wrote:it was me

Oh boy.

it was me i greifed everything

Knux wrote:it was me

I've figured as much for a while, but what exactly prompted you to say this now?

Did you simply want to see if you were able to get unbanned?

it doesn't matter who did it. the way danny and ghosthawk handled the situation was ridiclous. banning me, not demoting ghosthawk (considering that he is breaking other rules) and just in general being idiotic about it