Super Mario Bros. X Forums

Quill wrote:

MosaicMario wrote:Wow, only 47 entries, well, you know, quality over quanity

I've heard some good things (so far). I'll gladly take this amount if the level quality is consistent.

I have yet to hear anything bad from the levels myself. Tier 2 will not be so bad if all levels are as good as they say.

tier 1 or bust

Best of luck to everyone here!

MosaicMario wrote:Wow, only 47 entries, well, you know, quality over quanity

CC5 and CC6 was the best ones, and both had only 32 entries..
I prefeer less levels to play. CC3 was amazing too and with onlt 28 levels..
Anyway...good luck to everyone

Sux wrote:CC5 and CC6 was the best ones

blushes

I've been playing this game since I was like... 8 when 1.2.2 was the latest version but I only found the forum when I went looking for new episodes to play many years later my first download was Tower of Biased 6. by the time I signed up to the forum all the community contests had passed. This is my first one. I wouldn't know what's best and worst. As stated previously I've only played Tower of Biased 6 and X. X was long and I actually have some fond memories with 6.

Yoshi678 wrote:I've been playing this game since I was like... 8 when 1.2.2 was the latest version but I only found the forum when I went looking for new to play many years later my first download was Tower of Biased 6. by the time I signed up to the forum all the community contests had passed. This is my first one. I wouldn't know what's best and worst. As stated previously I've only played Tower of Biased 6 and X. X was long and I actually have some fond memories with 6.

Was not 6 the one that I made a seven star level that got in tier 3 or tier 4 that used all 21 sections and was broken as all Heaven?

If memory serves correctly 6 was the one styled like a SMB3 Dungeon level? If that isn't six then what is it?

Yoshi678 wrote:If memory serves correctly 6 was the one styled like a SMB3 Dungeon level? If that isn't six then what is it?

More like Metroid Fusion

MECHDRAGON777 wrote:Was not 6 the one that I made a seven star level that got in tier 3 or tier 4 that used all 21 sections and was broken as all Heaven?

I didn't think Heaven was really that broken honestly

Also I thought that was ToB 7? I could easily be wrong.

HenryRichard wrote:

MECHDRAGON777 wrote:Was not 6 the one that I made a seven star level that got in tier 3 or tier 4 that used all 21 sections and was broken as all Heaven?

I didn't think Heaven was really that broken honestly

Also I thought that was ToB 7? I could easily be wrong.

What is the mirror of it?

And 7 was like seven towers.

Oh yeah it was 6, 7 was the SMB2 styled one.

CC1-CC6 have extremely dated level styles. There's a few decent levels but overall they were just color switch trash.
CC7-CC12 have had a massive variety of quality issues. A vast majority are pretty godawful, save for a few extremely good levels I could count on one hand.

SCC1 hits a sweet spot for me tbh. Being the only one who has played (almost) all the levels, I find myself actually liking quite a bit of them, and the contest in itself has more phenomenally good levels than all the 12 contests smbx has hosted combined... in my humble opinion. Good luck to everyone who has submitted! You've impressed me at the very least, but then again that's not very hard.

Also TOB7 was the SMB2 one.

TLtimelord wrote:CC1-CC6 have extremely dated level styles. There's a few decent but overall they were just color switch trash.
CC7-CC12 have had a massive variety of quality issues. A vast majority are pretty godawful, save for a few extremely good I could count on one hand.

SCC1 hits a sweet spot for me tbh. Being the only one who has played (almost) all the , I find myself actually liking quite a bit of them, and the contest in itself has more phenomenally good than all the 12 contests smbx has hosted combined... in my humble opinion. Good luck to everyone who has submitted! You've impressed me at the very least, but then again that's not very hard.

Also TOB7 was the SMB2 one.

Glad to see. ...but this also means we have steep competition.

Also, I noticed that I am the only one that submitted a level that is part of a team.

MECHDRAGON777 wrote:Also, I noticed that I am the only one that submitted a level that is part of a team.

There was another person that submitted who had a partner initially, but his partner abandoned him midway and left him with a half-baked level. Very unfortunate that was the case.

well it's good to hear that most of the levels turned out great.

Zha Hong Lang wrote:

MECHDRAGON777 wrote:Also, I noticed that I am the only one that submitted a level that is part of a team.

There was another person that submitted who had a partner initially, but his partner abandoned him midway and left him with a half-baked level. Very unfortunate that was the case.

Why did I not get a notification for this? Anyway, did that person start over or what? If they did not, then why is the partner that abandoned them not listed?

He submitted his level.

MECHDRAGON777 wrote:did that person start over or what? If they did not, then why is the partner that abandoned them not listed?

Nothing from his partner went into the level. He only used the parts that he himself worked on, as far as I'm aware.

Zha Hong Lang wrote:

MECHDRAGON777 wrote:did that person start over or what? If they did not, then why is the partner that abandoned them not listed?

Nothing from his partner went into the level. He only used the parts that he himself worked on, as far as I'm aware.

Everything from my partner went into the level. That consists of almost nothing. He agrees that he does not deserve credit.