Page 15 of 24
Re: backtobasics
Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2016 9:51 pm
by aero
PixelPest wrote:I love these frequent, inaccurate generalizations by dumbass Marioheads. They make me laugh and cry at the same time
Shut up, PixelPest.
Re: backtobasics
Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2016 9:55 pm
by BTB
I think it's time we forget all this nonsense and get back to Mario.
Just a reminder, we got something BIG heading your way. And we've got some BIG name people on board with us, I think everyone's gonna be thoroughly impressed.
Re: backtobasics
Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2016 9:56 pm
by PixelPest
Magibowser wrote:I don't see how that rude remark was relevant to BTB's comment.
Is anything relevant to this topic? Really. It's a complete joke. If you really need it, I'll break it down for you then:
- Frequent --> often
- Inaccurate --> not pertaining to facts or relevant data; not true
- Generalizations --> statements used to portray a wide range of data that are often lacking justifiable means
- Dumbass --> a person who is one or more of the following: stubborn, unwise, unintelligent, and also often rude
- Marioheads --> you guys!
So I'm pretty much saying that BTB's comment is an unjustified remark that does not pertain to facts and that similarly classified statements have been spoken in the past by you guys to put others down.
And btw, here's the definition of pacifist. You guys claim to be pacifists, however you don't exactly seem to understand what it means:
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/pacifist
AeroMatter wrote:Shut up, PixelPest.
Why? This is just starting to get fun!
Re: backtobasics
Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2016 10:04 pm
by Black Mamba
what is anything
Re: backtobasics
Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2016 10:15 pm
by Egg
- Frequent --> the time you should be doing something productive instead of attacking our group, reviewing levels maybe?
- Inaccurate --> your idea we are forcing our ideals to the community when its their choice if they want to follow them or not.
- Generalizations --> the way you think our levels are all the same, bland and uninteresting because they all are representing our cause
- Dumbass --> a person who is one or more of the following: stubborn, unwise, unintelligent, and also often rude. Example: see the items above
- Marioheads --> our group's name
SnifitGuy wrote:I agree with pixelpest; anyone who takes this thread seriously needs to reevaluate their priorities.
Pixelpest himself seem to be taking this thread pretty seriously.
Re: backtobasics
Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2016 10:19 pm
by Yoshi021
This joke is already annoying. You simply walk away from all your problems and lie on your motives. This BTB joke has not done a single level that is not terrible. I already said, if you really dislike the new features of SMBX, just download 1.0 and have fun doing nothing.
Re: backtobasics
Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2016 10:21 pm
by TLtimelord
Who knew the classic nintendo style was "bland and uninteresting."
PixelPest it's your fault this community has become so elitist. Shame on you.
Re: backtobasics
Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2016 10:24 pm
by PixelPest
TNTtimelord wrote:Who knew the classic nintendo style was "bland and uninteresting."
PixelPest it's your fault this community has become so elitist. Shame on you.
How is it my fault lol? Is it like "blame PixelPest for all of your issues day" or something?
And btw, I'm not taking this topic seriously at all, even though it may seem that way
Re: backtobasics
Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2016 10:26 pm
by Julia Pseudo
This is escalating to a flame war on all sides, let's not do that.
Re: backtobasics
Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2016 10:33 pm
by Yoshi021
Pseudo-dino wrote:This is escalating to a flame war on all sides, let's not do that.
It already was.
Re: backtobasics
Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2016 10:34 pm
by PersonNamedUser
Pseudo-dino wrote:This is escalating to a flame war on all sides, let's not do that.
this thread was doomed to become a flame war to begin with.
Re: backtobasics
Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2016 10:37 pm
by BTB
I agree with Pseudo-dino, these worthless squabbles aren't what Mario is about. If you want to be a faker, that's fine, but don't come here and attack us. We just wanna talk about Mario.

Re: backtobasics
Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2016 10:38 pm
by PixelPest
BTB wrote:I agree with Pseudo-dino, these worthless squabbles aren't what Mario is about. If you want to be a faker, that's fine, but don't come here and attack us. We just wanna talk about Mario.

Not unless you guys stop attacking "fakers"
Re: backtobasics
Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2016 10:39 pm
by Julia Pseudo
This will only become a flame war if people make it one, so let's not do that.
Re: backtobasics
Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2016 10:40 pm
by Yoshi021
BTB wrote:I agree with Pseudo-dino, these worthless squabbles aren't what Mario is about. If you want to be a faker, that's fine, but don't come here and attack us. We just wanna talk about Mario.

Not really, what you want to do is start a mediocre movement that fails to represent what a Mario game truly is. Instead, you make fake propaganda and create your own make-believe facts for no absolutely reason.
Re: backtobasics
Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2016 10:41 pm
by PixelPest
Pseudo-dino wrote:This will only become a flame war if people make it one, so let's not do that.
How does two sides with conflicting opinions with one side who goes around criticizing most things that do not abide to their rules and try to force people into becoming Marioheads not become a flame war?
Re: backtobasics
Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2016 10:42 pm
by Egg
stop instigating
Re: backtobasics
Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2016 10:42 pm
by TLtimelord
Have you guys ever wondered we're not actually attacking you guys and you're taking this way too seriously.
In the back of your minds, you're extremely fumed at the teasing.
Maybe you should stop being... a faker.
Re: backtobasics
Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2016 10:42 pm
by aero
Flaming is not the Brooklyn way. Let's take this fight outside. Meet me at the playground after school.
Re: backtobasics
Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2016 10:43 pm
by Julia Pseudo
PixelPest wrote:Pseudo-dino wrote:This will only become a flame war if people make it one, so let's not do that.
How does two sides with conflicting opinions with one side who goes around criticizing most things that do not abide to their rules and try to force people into becoming Marioheads not become a flame war?
Nobody has criticized any content outside of this thread since its creation, as far as I'm aware.
also yeah the first line of TNT's comment