Super Mario Bros. X Forums

Yeah I'm pretty sure it's 13 as well.

Mini-announcement:

There's been frequent reports of downreps with "bad reasoning," or reasons that aren't listed in the rep rules. Unless the downrep is directly against the rules, nothing is going to happen to it. Thanks for your time.

GhostHawk wrote:

Kyo wrote:#Eric4president

But no really, I'm starting to think COPPA users should really have limited permissions, and I'm not saying that because I'm trying to mock him or anything.

COPPA aren't supposed to be able to post. I don't know why they can though.

That would tick off lots of people.

Just a thing, but why now people can uprep/downrep for the same post again? For example, you can see PaperPlayerX's reputation: he got 4 downreps for one single post. I thought you can't uprep/downrep anymore an user for a post if it already got an uprep/downrep.

He just got his fifth one. This is why this community is the maturest of all

That post wasn't even worth any downrep, but do what you want.

Kyo wrote:He just got his fifth one. This is why this community is the maturest of all

That post wasn't even worth any downrep, but do what you want.

So we went from using the word bias all the time to using the word Mature? This shows how much people care about others...

Nothing I just said is related to PaperPlayerX, I used his reputation page as an example.

Christian07 wrote:Just a thing, but why now people can uprep/downrep for the same post again? For example, you can see PaperPlayerX's reputation: he got 4 downreps for one single post. I thought you can't uprep/downrep anymore an user for a post if it already got an uprep/downrep.

That is actually pretty unfair. It's against the rules for the reputation mod.

Christian07 wrote:Just a thing, but why now people can uprep/downrep for the same post again? For example, you can see PaperPlayerX's reputation: he got 4 downreps for one single post. I thought you can't uprep/downrep anymore an user for a post if it already got an uprep/downrep.

you can't downrep/uprep a post more than once

Kyo wrote:He just got his fifth one. This is why this community is the maturest of all

That post wasn't even worth any downrep, but do what you want.

When did I get a fifth one?

That many downreps for that single post is just asinine. One or two would've been more reasonable, as I said on my comment when I uprepped him, but FIVE downreps? Seriously, people.

Zeldamaster12 wrote:That many downreps for that single post is just asinine. One or two would've been more reasonable, as I said on my comment when I uprepped him, but FIVE downreps? Seriously, people.

Seriously where did you guys get 5 from?
But thanks for the support from my friends for sticking up for me. Even though the rep system may be screwy at times, it does help remind you that there are people on your side...and people who aren't on your side.

this is the most ironic shit ever

first, even if that post didn't deserve that many downreps, it also didn't deserve the ammount of upreps it's getting right now.

inb4 the rebuttal: "but he got downrepped, so it makes this even"

go look at the rules boys

5. Do not uprep a user simply because they were downrepped.

and, yes, the people who downrepped the dude are also breaking another rule, i won't deny that.

5. Do not downrep a user if they've been downrepped multiple times for the same post before. You can't track downreps to the posts they were given for but if you know the user has received downreps for the post, don't downrep them again.

both sides are equally as wrong, now pls don't fuck arround with someone else's rep count.

and also

Kyo wrote:He just got his fifth one. This is why this community is the maturest of all

We are all 110% aware that this community is garbage in one way or another, you don't need to remind us of that shit.

PaperPlayerX wrote:and people who aren't on your side.

You shouldn't think like that. Just because they downrepped you, you shouldn't consider them as foes.

Kyo wrote:

PaperPlayerX wrote:and people who aren't on your side.

You shouldn't think like that. Just because they downrepped you, you shouldn't consider them as foes.

That's not really what I was implying.
I don't consider any of the 4 people who DRed me foes. In fact, I would've accepted having just 1 or 2 downreps from that little conflict.
When I said this:

PaperPlayerX wrote:and people who aren't on your side.

I was referring to people that bully and take advantage of, abuse, or misuse the downrep system. I wouldn't consider my downreppers in the wrong, but I agree that 4 is asinine.

Just a thing, but can the staff can make so you are unable to uprep/downrep an user for a post if that post already got an uprep/downrep? That would make less situation like the one PaperPlayerX had before.

Christian07 wrote:Just a thing, but can the staff can make so you are unable to uprep/downrep an user for a post if that post already got an uprep/downrep? That would make less situation like the one PaperPlayerX had before.

That would make the rules actually be enforced.

Christian07 wrote:Just a thing, but can the staff can make so you are unable to uprep/downrep an user for a post if that post already got an uprep/downrep? That would make less situation like the one PaperPlayerX had before.

It's already in the rules, but only applies for downreps. Would be extremely stupid if it would apply for upreps.

Kyo wrote:

Christian07 wrote:Just a thing, but can the staff can make so you are unable to uprep/downrep an user for a post if that post already got an uprep/downrep? That would make less situation like the one PaperPlayerX had before.

It's already in the rules, but only applies for downreps. Would be extremely stupid if it would apply for upreps.

Yeah, especially if multiple people wanted to uprep someone for a great episode.

But that means nothing. Multiple people would want to downrep somebody regardless of being unfair and against the rules. The same should apply to upreps.