Site Discussion Thread

This is where we'll store the "best" topics that have ever existed on the forums, as well as community events that are no longer relevant. Read at your own risk.

Moderator: Userbase Moderators

Forum rules
Read at your own risk.
Snessy the duck
Mouser
Mouser
Posts: 2699
Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2014 6:04 am

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Postby Snessy the duck » Sat Apr 15, 2017 5:57 am

Shadow Yoshi wrote:Ah. Well, requests would probably be part of a "Graphics forum rules", should the staff ever decide to create that. Sendspace enforcement is up to them too. Wouldn't hurt to have some sort of guide telling people which services to use for various tasks like that.
I agree that we should have some sort of GFX forum rules sticky, or perhaps just a sticky saying GFX requests aren't allowed. Also, do you guys maybe have thoughts of banning 4shared too, since it requires people to sign up to download stuff.

HeroLinik
Larry Koopa
Larry Koopa
Posts: 3464
Joined: Fri Dec 20, 2013 1:28 pm
Contact:

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Postby HeroLinik » Mon Apr 17, 2017 5:04 pm

Shadow Yoshi wrote:Ah. Well, requests would probably be part of a "Graphics forum rules", should the staff ever decide to create that.
The problem is, you alluded to that at the very start of the topic, which is two and a half months ago, which was based on a post I made in an older topic the week before. Unfortunately, nothing has been done about any form of creating graphic submission regulations despite the fact you mentioned that you were going to alert the staff of this issue. And then if a regular user steps up to the task of writing the rules, then there's a high chance that the topic will get locked for backseat moderating and subsequently buried, or just completely deleted, despite the fact that the topic was an effort to stop the repeated graphic requests that are almost flooding the forum thanks to the poor communication of the no-requests rule.

On top of this issue, I really hate to say this, but the forum is pretty badly-maintained. Examples I can bring up include important rules getting shelved almost a few weeks after debut, with this assumption that new users join automatically knowing these rules (as was mentioned by another post earlier), and suggestions that take ages to implement despite the fact that they're pretty trivial. In particular, the former is so jarring if you're someone who's returning to the community after a hiatus back when requests were a thing. Something really needs to be done about this.

Snessy the duck
Mouser
Mouser
Posts: 2699
Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2014 6:04 am

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Postby Snessy the duck » Tue Apr 18, 2017 10:54 am

HeroLinik wrote:
Shadow Yoshi wrote:Ah. Well, requests would probably be part of a "Graphics forum rules", should the staff ever decide to create that.
The problem is, you alluded to that at the very start of the topic, which is two and a half months ago, which was based on a post I made in an older topic the week before. Unfortunately, nothing has been done about any form of creating graphic submission regulations despite the fact you mentioned that you were going to alert the staff of this issue. And then if a regular user steps up to the task of writing the rules, then there's a high chance that the topic will get locked for backseat moderating and subsequently buried, or just completely deleted, despite the fact that the topic was an effort to stop the repeated graphic requests that are almost flooding the forum thanks to the poor communication of the no-requests rule.
I agree with this, we need to do something about this. The graphic forums are being flooded with requests and locked topics, yet nothing has been done about it, which I seriously don't get why, cause it's a really big problem. I really hope the admins are actually gonna do it this time rather than completely forgetting about it until it's brought up again, only for history to repeat itself. Also, not to mention the Sendspace rule is also archived for no reason as well.

Cedur
Link
Link
Posts: 7073
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2016 10:14 am
Flair: I'm gone, for chess and minesweeper
Pronouns: he/him

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Postby Cedur » Tue Apr 18, 2017 12:18 pm

Locking topics that don't serve any purpose (graphics requests, nonexistent projects) has always been illogical. All that it effects is clogging a subforum with useless threads.

FanofSMBX
Ludwig von Koopa
Ludwig von Koopa
Posts: 3878
Joined: Sun Dec 22, 2013 12:01 pm

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Postby FanofSMBX » Tue Apr 18, 2017 1:55 pm

Why does every other ad have a girl in a demure position on it?

HeroLinik
Larry Koopa
Larry Koopa
Posts: 3464
Joined: Fri Dec 20, 2013 1:28 pm
Contact:

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Postby HeroLinik » Tue Apr 18, 2017 2:02 pm

FanofSMBX wrote:Why does every other ad have a girl in a demure position on it?
Also, why does the ad appear right at the top of the page? Of course, installing an adblocker is a surefire way to prevent it, but the fact we have to do so in the first place is an example of bad website design.

PixelPest
Link
Link
Posts: 7111
Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2015 5:38 pm
Flair: Tamer of Boom Booms
Contact:

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Postby PixelPest » Tue Apr 18, 2017 2:04 pm

Image

Shadow Yoshi
Dark Knight
Dark Knight
Posts: 4291
Joined: Sun Dec 01, 2013 12:56 pm

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Postby Shadow Yoshi » Tue Apr 18, 2017 8:25 pm

HeroLinik wrote:
FanofSMBX wrote:Why does every other ad have a girl in a demure position on it?
Also, why does the ad appear right at the top of the page? Of course, installing an adblocker is a surefire way to prevent it, but the fact we have to do so in the first place is an example of bad website design.
No, it isn't. Bad website design would be having ads that are invasive, which this one is not. Also, ads at the top of the page are seen more than ads at the bottom.

Let me know if you see that Puck bikini ad again - I've removed it in the past but decided to keep it this time, however if it bothers you guys then I'll make sure it's not there anymore.

PixelPest
Link
Link
Posts: 7111
Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2015 5:38 pm
Flair: Tamer of Boom Booms
Contact:

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Postby PixelPest » Tue Apr 18, 2017 10:15 pm

I've seen it upwards of 3-4 times in the last few weeks or so. It doesn't bother me really but I just think it's unnecessarily sexy for a Mario forum with all of that cleavage

Snessy the duck
Mouser
Mouser
Posts: 2699
Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2014 6:04 am

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Postby Snessy the duck » Wed Apr 19, 2017 10:50 am

Supershroom wrote:Locking topics that don't serve any purpose (graphics requests, nonexistent projects) has always been illogical. All that it effects is clogging a subforum with useless threads.
I agree, there's literally no reason in keeping them, other than it clogging up the forums. I think we should just delete them.

Also, I'm surprised Joey didn't comment on HeroLink's "Badly maintained" post.

Shadow Yoshi
Dark Knight
Dark Knight
Posts: 4291
Joined: Sun Dec 01, 2013 12:56 pm

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Postby Shadow Yoshi » Wed Apr 19, 2017 11:29 am

I mean, most of that stuff is not up to me anymore.

Snessy the duck
Mouser
Mouser
Posts: 2699
Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2014 6:04 am

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Postby Snessy the duck » Wed Apr 19, 2017 11:31 am

Shadow Yoshi wrote:I mean, most of that stuff is not up to me anymore.
Well, I'm at least surprised the admins didn't respond to it.

Snessy the duck
Mouser
Mouser
Posts: 2699
Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2014 6:04 am

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Postby Snessy the duck » Fri Apr 21, 2017 11:06 am

I'm honestly surprised that none of the admins besides Joey have responded to HeroLink's post.

Snessy the duck
Mouser
Mouser
Posts: 2699
Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2014 6:04 am

Okay, we really need to do something about this.

Postby Snessy the duck » Sat Apr 22, 2017 12:17 pm

Okay, we seriously NEED to do something about this whole Archived Rules thing, since it's a really big problem and nothing has been done about it, which I seriously don't get. Also, there's the whole "Badly-maintained" thing which we also need to look into.

On an unreater note, there's various minor leftovers from the FF/R forum in the game masters description, as well as leftovers from the level judges in the project forum rules which probably need to be removed.

HeroLinik
Larry Koopa
Larry Koopa
Posts: 3464
Joined: Fri Dec 20, 2013 1:28 pm
Contact:

Re: Okay, we really need to do something about this.

Postby HeroLinik » Sat Apr 22, 2017 12:19 pm

Snessy the duck wrote:Okay, we seriously NEED to do something about this whole Archived Rules thing, since it's a really big problem and nothing has been done about it, which I seriously don't get. Also, there's the whole "Badly-maintained" thing which we also need to look into.

On an unreater note, there's various minor leftovers from the FF/R forum in the game masters description, as well as leftovers from the level judges in the project forum rules which probably need to be removed.
I totally agree with you. As I'm going to state before, with the way the rules are so disorganised and older rules being left for no reason, the forum is turning into a trainwreck of bad maintenance, especially when we get more new users requesting graphics, unknown to them that they can't, and the way that these have been forwarded to admins, yet nothing has been done about them.

Thehelmetguy1
Boom Boom
Boom Boom
Posts: 2372
Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2015 9:33 am
Flair: certified idiot

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Postby Thehelmetguy1 » Sat Apr 22, 2017 7:46 pm

^
There are a lot of things that were left alone and should be fixed.
Also, I have noticed that the admins have been pretty inactive lately. Valtteri rarely comes to the forums, Quill is the same, and Pseudo is rarely active anywhere(Not as much inactive as Valtteri and Quill though).
ZM is the most active of the four, and still, he is pretty inactive​ for an admin.
Seriously, the mods are much more active than the admins, while it should be the opposite.

HeroLinik
Larry Koopa
Larry Koopa
Posts: 3464
Joined: Fri Dec 20, 2013 1:28 pm
Contact:

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Postby HeroLinik » Sun Apr 23, 2017 4:07 am

thehelmetguy1 wrote:^
There are a lot of things that were left alone and should be fixed.
Also, I have noticed that the admins have been pretty inactive lately. Valtteri rarely comes to the forums, Quill is the same, and Pseudo is rarely active anywhere(Not as much inactive as Valtteri and Quill though).
They've got a real life as well, they can't just frequent this place 24-7. Also, you may have to consider that around this time a lot of people have exams and that so they may be studying for it.

Blobx
Shy Guy
Shy Guy
Posts: 7
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2017 11:24 am

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Postby Blobx » Sun Apr 23, 2017 9:58 am

Does anyone know how to change your other picture like:
Grinder
Yoshi

Because i'm stuck as a goomba.

Thanks! :)

Just so you know, i'm new.

Snessy the duck
Mouser
Mouser
Posts: 2699
Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2014 6:04 am

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Postby Snessy the duck » Sun Apr 23, 2017 10:16 am

It's your rank, it'll change as you make more posts.

Thehelmetguy1
Boom Boom
Boom Boom
Posts: 2372
Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2015 9:33 am
Flair: certified idiot

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Postby Thehelmetguy1 » Sun Apr 23, 2017 10:36 am

^
Here is an info on the ranks:
viewtopic.php?f=48&t=961


Return to “Archives”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

SMWCentralTalkhausMario Fan Games GalaxyKafukaMarioWikiSMBXEquipoEstelari