Super Mario Bros. X Forums

Choco blames Hyperme for this town's downfall.

Ok now, so what is going on? I just got herw but stuff happening and i don't know whats happening. Please fill me.

Choco was hanged in the town square.

It is now Night 6.

Night will end at 8:00 PM EST tomorrow.

Claiming last townie roll. If a member of the mafia or another townie would like to claim as well, go ahead.

One of the last two green rolls anyway.

Well... what to do now? We don't really have any leads which is really bad. What NOW!???

Claiming one of the last townsperson.

By the way, I'd suggest to post who you are suspecting, it might help a bit.

FallingSnow wrote:Claiming last townie roll. If a member of the mafia or another townie would like to claim as well, go ahead.

Unless the King of Dragons is already died, It's impossible that you can be the last townie. Can you please give me a reason of why I can trust you as one?

Want to see evidence of me being a townie? I never lynched any innocent apart for Choco (who was the only lead and there was a good reason, so I thought he was mafia).

RudeGuy07 wrote:

FallingSnow wrote:Claiming last townie roll. If a member of the mafia or another townie would like to claim as well, go ahead.

Unless the King of Dragons is already died, It's impossible that you can be the last townie. Can you please give me a reason of why I can trust you as one?

Want to see evidence of me being a townie? I never lynched any innocent apart for Choco (who was the only lead and there was a good reason, so I thought he was mafia).

What you just said didn't prove absolutely nothing considering that:

A: How do you even know Choco was innocent? Maybe he's the Dragon King
B: You're implying that lynching someone that's innocent makes them instantly a Mafia, and by that logic it also states that we are all Mafias considering we lynched other innocent people we thought were Mafia. And doesn't make because there can only be four Mafias in this game and there's nine players left.

So yeah you haven't proved anything.

zlakergirl357 wrote:A: How do you even know Choco was innocent? Maybe he's the Dragon King

Never implied that.

zlakergirl357 wrote:B: You're implying that lynching someone that's innocent makes them instantly a Mafia, and by that logic it also states that we are all Mafias considering we lynched other innocent people we thought were Mafia. And doesn't make because there can only be four Mafias in this game and there's nine players left.

I never implied that lynching someone that's innocent makes them instantly a Mafia, I only implied that I never lynched any innocent apart for Choco, and if I would have been mafia I'd have lynched them. Did you even read my post carefully?

Why is it that in mafia people aruge about the littlest things?


Please people, let us think about what we are going to do tomorrow?

Bloodedge wrote:Why is it that in mafia people aruge about the littlest things?


Please people, let us think about what we are going to do tomorrow?

This isn't "the littlest things". We have almost sniffed out a Mafioso.

RudeGuy07 wrote:

zlakergirl357 wrote: A: How do you even know Choco was innocent? Maybe he's the Dragon King

Never implied that.

1.) How the fuck does that question I just asked state that anyone fucking implying anything?
2.) You literally just said that you didn't lynched anyone innocent apart from Choco.

RudeGuy07 wrote:Did you even read my post carefully?

You shouldn't really saying that considering you didn't mine read properly either.

RudeGuy07 wrote:

zlakergirl357 wrote:B: You're implying that lynching someone that's innocent makes them instantly a Mafia, and by that logic it also states that we are all Mafias considering we lynched other innocent people we thought were Mafia. And doesn't make because there can only be four Mafias in this game and there's nine players left.

I never implied that lynching someone that's innocent makes them instantly a Mafia, I only implied that I never lynched any innocent apart for Choco, and if I would have been mafia I'd have lynched them.

You're implying that you're townie because you didn't lynch any innocent. So if you got lynched in Day 1 and you turned out to be a townie wouldn't that make everyone who voted for you not townie? Your logic doesn't make sense at all.

zlakergirl357 wrote:1.) How the fuck does that question I just asked state that anyone fucking implying anything?

I used the wrong verb.

zlakergirl357 wrote:2.) You literally just said that you didn't lynched anyone innocent apart from Choco.

What does me lynching someone have about that someone might or not might be innocent?

zlakergirl357 wrote:You're implying that you're townie because you didn't lynch any innocent. So if you got lynched in Day 1 and you turned out to be a townie wouldn't that make everyone who voted for you not townie? Your logic doesn't make sense at all.

When someone doesn't lynch in a day is because that someone is inactive (I wasn't inactive for all this game) or he isn't sure about the one everyone lynch. If an innocent is lynched, for a mafia it's a bit stupid to don't lynch him (unless that mafia is inactive).
And by the way,

zlakergirl357 wrote:wouldn't that make everyone who (didn't) voted for you not townie?

I think you have made an error here.

---

If you still think it doesn't make sense, then look at all my post in this topic. Do you think they makes me mafia? I don't think so.

RudeGuy07 wrote:

zlakergirl357 wrote:1.) How the fuck does that question I just asked state that anyone fucking implying anything?

I used the wrong verb.

The only verb you used was "implied" and I fail to see how other verbs can change the context of that message in a way to proves I am wrong and makes you less suspicious.

RudeGuy07 wrote:

zlakergirl357 wrote:You're implying that you're townie because you didn't lynch any innocent. So if you got lynched in Day 1 and you turned out to be a townie wouldn't that make everyone who voted for you not townie? Your logic doesn't make sense at all.

When someone doesn't lynch in a day is because that someone is inactive (I wasn't inactive for all this game) or he isn't sure about the one everyone lynch. If an innocent is lynched, for a mafia it's a bit stupid to don't lynch him (unless that mafia is inactive).

How is that relevant when we are clearly talking about something completely different? The fact that the Mafia is inactive or not isn't what we are talking about here.

RudeGuy07 wrote: And by the way,

zlakergirl357 wrote:wouldn't that make everyone who (didn't) voted for you not townie?

I think you have made an error here

.....no I didn't?

RudeGuy07 wrote:If you still think it doesn't make sense, then look at all my post in this topic. Do you think they makes me mafia? I don't think so.

If you expect me to go through 23 pages, then think again.

zlakergirl357 wrote:The only verb you used was "implied" and I fail to see how other verbs can change the context of that message in a way to proves I am wrong and makes you less suspicious.

I used "implied". I meant "say". Whatever.

zlakergirl357 wrote:How is that relevant when we are clearly talking about something completely different? The fact that the Mafia is inactive or not isn't what we are talking about here.

...You didn't get my point at all. I wasn't talking about mafia being inactive. I was talking about why someone who didn't lynch an innocent has high probability of being an innocent.

zlakergirl357 wrote:

RudeGuy07 wrote:And by the way,

zlakergirl357 wrote:wouldn't that make everyone who (didn't) voted for you not townie?

I think you have made an error here

.....no I didn't?

...It is even italized what error you made.
And I thought you have read carefully my posts. Looks like you didn't, really.

zlakergirl357 wrote:

RudeGuy07 wrote:If you still think it doesn't make sense, then look at all my post in this topic. Do you think they makes me mafia? I don't think so.

If you expect me to go through 23 pages, then think again.

Come on, it is so hard to search?

RudeGuy07 wrote:

zlakergirl357 wrote:The only verb you used was "implied" and I fail to see how other verbs can change the context of that message in a way to proves I am wrong and makes you less suspicious.

I used "implied". I meant "say". Whatever.

Even if you meant this...

RudeGuy07 wrote:Never said that.

...you still said this...

RudeGuy07 wrote:Want to see evidence of me being a townie? I never lynched any innocent apart for Choco (who was the only lead and there was a good reason, so I thought he was mafia).

RudeGuy07 wrote:

zlakergirl357 wrote:How is that relevant when we are clearly talking about something completely different? The fact that the Mafia is inactive or not isn't what we are talking about here.

...You didn't get my point at all. I wasn't talking about mafia being inactive. I was talking about why someone who didn't lynch an innocent has high probability of being an innocent.

Just because you're not lynching an innocent doesn't it mean you've a low probability for being a Mafia.

RudeGuy07 wrote:...It is even italized what error you made.
And I thought you have read carefully my posts. Looks like you didn't, really.

Really? Then let me show you my quote again...

zlakergirl357 wrote:You're implying that you're townie because you didn't lynch any innocent. So if you got lynched in Day 1 and you turned out to be a townie wouldn't that make everyone who voted for you not townie? Your logic doesn't make sense at all.

Since I haven't been replaced yet, I might as well say that Zeldamaster12 seems shifty. His response to Bloodedge about, "We've almost sniffed out a Mafioso" seems like he's trying to get us to proceed with a lynch either way on RudeGuy or zlaker.
I personally am more comfortable with a RudeGuy lynch than a zlaker lynch.
Dunno how my replacement will feel though.

zlakergirl357 wrote:

RudeGuy07 wrote:Want to see evidence of me being a townie? I never lynched any innocent apart for Choco (who was the only lead and there was a good reason, so I thought he was mafia).

And that "I never said this" was reffered to this:

zlakergirl357 wrote:A: How do you even know Choco was innocent? Maybe he's the Dragon King

So that quote is irrilevant to this. Besides, why are you even still arguing about this? It won't make me look suspicious in any way.

---

zlakergirl357 wrote:Just because you're not lynching an innocent doesn't it mean you've a low probability for being a Mafia.

Okay. I don't think I'll ever can change your idea. I have said here why it's not true, anyway.
If you want to see evidence, look at my posts.

---

zlakergirl357 wrote:

RudeGuy07 wrote:...It is even italized what error you made.
And I thought you have read carefully my posts. Looks like you didn't, really.

Really? Then let me show you my quote again...

zlakergirl357 wrote:You're implying that you're townie because you didn't lynch any innocent. So if you got lynched in Day 1 and you turned out to be a townie wouldn't that make everyone who voted for you not townie? Your logic doesn't make sense at all.

I don't get what you want to accomplish with posting that quote...
Anyway, let me tell me that this statement:

wouldn't that make everyone who voted for you not townie?

is false. I never said that. I said all the contrary.

---

And why would I be suspicious? I already said why I am a townie, and if you don't think that isn't quite right, then look and previous posts. I don't think I have ever said something a mafioso would have said.

Mivixion wrote:Since I haven't been replaced yet, I might as well say that Zeldamaster12 seems shifty. His response to Bloodedge about, "We've almost sniffed out a Mafioso" seems like he's trying to get us to proceed with a lynch either way on RudeGuy or zlaker.
I personally am more comfortable with a RudeGuy lynch than a zlaker lynch.
Dunno how my replacement will feel though.

I said we were close of finding a potential lead, I didn't blatantly accuse anyone of being Mafia. Zlaker's argument seems more convincing to me than Rudeguy's.