Re: M7: Mafiafia - Day 1
Posted: Wed Sep 24, 2014 9:07 pm
are we seriously bandwagoning someone based on the fact that they sent other people a PM? that's a pretty ridiculous leap of logic if you ask me.
Maybe he is telling the truth, and both him and qig are Mafia!Zeldamaster12 wrote:There is a reason though, you have been caught PMing someone, and there's a possibility it could be with the Mafia.
Obviously you don't know me. No matter what side I'm on, I'd panic if every friggin person ever jumped on me. I don't want to die. I sometimes wish I'd never been born at all.KoolKat wrote:
If you were town, you wouldn't be panicking, trust me.
THANK YOU! This is the message I've been trying to convey all along.qig wrote:are we seriously bandwagoning someone based on the fact that they sent other people a PM? that's a pretty ridiculous leap of logic if you ask me.
How can both be true at once? Why would I PM qig about who was in the Mafia if we were Mafia? Another leap of logic. A few more and you'll have beaten World 1-1.KoolKat wrote:Maybe he is telling the truth, and both him and qig are Mafia!Zeldamaster12 wrote:There is a reason though, you have been caught PMing someone, and there's a possibility it could be with the Mafia.
Very unlikely though.
Eh, I guess so, but honestly, the way you're acting does not fly by as townpanic but rather mafiapanic.PaperPlayerX wrote:Obviously you don't know me. No matter what side I'm on, I'd panic if every friggin person ever jumped on me. I don't want to die. I sometimes wish I'd never been born at all.
Since we don't have other leads, we should lynch the person who has been sending PMs and therefore has something to hide, based on the fact that they couldn't just post it in the thread.PaperPlayerX wrote:THANK YOU! This is the message I've been trying to convey all along.
Do you swear to tell the whole truth, the complete truth, and nothing but the truth???PaperPlayerX wrote:How can both be true at once? Why would I PM qig about who was in the Mafia if we were Mafia? Another leap of logic. A few more and you'll have beaten World 1-1.
What evidence do you have to support that I am lying? You are basically trying to use theories as evidence, which doesn't work. I repeat: IT DOES NOT WORK. Again, just because I've been sending PMs does NOT mean I have something to hide. Why haven't you grasped this concept yet?KoolKat wrote:Eh, I guess so, but honestly, the way you're acting does not fly by as townpanic but rather mafiapanic.PaperPlayerX wrote:Obviously you don't know me. No matter what side I'm on, I'd panic if every friggin person ever jumped on me. I don't want to die. I sometimes wish I'd never been born at all.
Since we don't have other leads, we should lynch the person who has been sending PMs and therefore has something to hide, based on the fact that they couldn't just post it in the thread.PaperPlayerX wrote:THANK YOU! This is the message I've been trying to convey all along.
Do you swear to tell the whole truth, the complete truth, and nothing but the truth???PaperPlayerX wrote:How can both be true at once? Why would I PM qig about who was in the Mafia if we were Mafia? Another leap of logic. A few more and you'll have beaten World 1-1.
If qig and you were both Mafia, you could have actually been talking about the identities of the blues, or who to kill the next night.
You still could be lying.
PaperPlayerX wrote:What evidence do you have to support that I am lying? You are basically trying to use theories as evidence, which doesn't work. I repeat: IT DOES NOT WORK. Again, just because I've been sending PMs does NOT mean I have something to hide. Why haven't you grasped this concept yet?KoolKat wrote:Eh, I guess so, but honestly, the way you're acting does not fly by as townpanic but rather mafiapanic.PaperPlayerX wrote:Obviously you don't know me. No matter what side I'm on, I'd panic if every friggin person ever jumped on me. I don't want to die. I sometimes wish I'd never been born at all.
Since we don't have other leads, we should lynch the person who has been sending PMs and therefore has something to hide, based on the fact that they couldn't just post it in the thread.PaperPlayerX wrote:THANK YOU! This is the message I've been trying to convey all along.
Do you swear to tell the whole truth, the complete truth, and nothing but the truth???PaperPlayerX wrote:How can both be true at once? Why would I PM qig about who was in the Mafia if we were Mafia? Another leap of logic. A few more and you'll have beaten World 1-1.
If qig and you were both Mafia, you could have actually been talking about the identities of the blues, or who to kill the next night.
You still could be lying.
Also, how can you tell the difference between "townpanic" and "mafiapanic?" Do you have "vibes" that you just "get" out of scenic nowhere? WHY HAVEN'T YOU TRIED TO PROVE ANY OF YOUR THEORIES?
No, no, and no. It's in fact the OTHER way around. You are pulling a fast one and trying to make ME look guilty. You see why I'm doing this? It's because I'm trying to prove how much of a hypocrite you are to this whole matter. You are also pulling a "No True Scotsman" by trying to say, "Well, no true X would Y because of baseless reason Z." And, again, you haven't proved any of your theories. What evidence do you have? What research have you done? And what truely do you have as factual proof that I'm a Mafioso? Thus concludes my rebuttal.KoolKat wrote:
This is what I meant by panicking. Now you're just trying to make me look guilty.
If you were truly town, you wouldn't be pulling a Gohan card.
Also, my guaranteed townie read was because you claimed to me so innocently, but honestly, it's getting a bit annoying so yeah lynch PaperPlayerX
This actually makes alot of sense. I truly believe you are a townie.Blue Bomber wrote:qig was so quick to post my message and draw all attention to me over what I did. Although it was my fault for sounding suspicious, it also makes me believe that qig as drawing all attention to me so that he may remain in the shadows.
I think PaperPlayerX is trying to do damage control but he is making it incredibly obvious at this point that he isn't a vanilla townie.
Oh and that post qig made earlier he was directly defending PaperPlayerX as if they were part of a team or group.
My guess is that qig and PaperPlayerX are Mafia and we should consider their actions and get them lynched before they cause any trouble.
You brought that attention on yourself, you know. Of COURSE someone is going to make it public! Why wouldn't they? qig had an opinion and he expressed it. I find nothing wrong with that.Blue Bomber wrote:qig was so quick to post my message and draw all attention to me over what I did. Although it was my fault for sounding suspicious, it also makes me believe that qig as drawing all attention to me so that he may remain in the shadows.
I think PaperPlayerX is trying to do damage control but he is making it incredibly obvious at this point that he isn't a vanilla townie.
Oh and that post qig made earlier he was directly defending PaperPlayerX as if they were part of a team or group.
My guess is that qig and PaperPlayerX are Mafia and we should consider their actions and get them lynched before they cause any trouble.
Actually, no. I am truly aligned with the town, and no, if you look back, it was Blue Bomber who posted the initial evidence against you.PaperPlayerX wrote:No, no, and no. It's in fact the OTHER way around. You are pulling a fast one and trying to make ME look guilty. You see why I'm doing this? It's because I'm trying to prove how much of a hypocrite you are to this whole matter.
Again, you are making long posts that sound professional (think buzzwords) but are actually filled with nothing but stale air and a bit of fluff.PaperPlayerX wrote: You are also pulling a "No True Scotsman" by trying to say, "Well, no true X would Y because of baseless reason Z." And, again, you haven't proved any of your theories.
Evidence: See - Blue Bomber's posts and mine regarding all the evidence against you, including overpanic, mysterious PMing to qig, and more.PaperPlayerX wrote:What evidence do you have? What research have you done?
More buzzwording.PaperPlayerX wrote:And what truely do you have as factual proof that I'm a Mafioso? Thus concludes my rebuttal.
You guys are REALLY narrow minded, you know that? You really are. You're tunnel-visioned morons who don't even play fair.KoolKat wrote:This post is too big to eat in one bite! Let's take it in chunks!
Actually, no. I am truly aligned with the town, and no, if you look back, it was Blue Bomber who posted the initial evidence against you.PaperPlayerX wrote:No, no, and no. It's in fact the OTHER way around. You are pulling a fast one and trying to make ME look guilty. You see why I'm doing this? It's because I'm trying to prove how much of a hypocrite you are to this whole matter.
Again, you are making long posts that sound professional (think buzzwords) but are actually filled with nothing but stale air and a bit of fluff.PaperPlayerX wrote: You are also pulling a "No True Scotsman" by trying to say, "Well, no true X would Y because of baseless reason Z." And, again, you haven't proved any of your theories.
Evidence: See - Blue Bomber's posts and mine regarding all the evidence against you, including overpanic, mysterious PMing to qig, and more.PaperPlayerX wrote:What evidence do you have? What research have you done?
Research: Quite a bit of rolehunting, as if nobody is lying except you I know the identities of at least 5 players.
More buzzwording.PaperPlayerX wrote:And what truely do you have as factual proof that I'm a Mafioso? Thus concludes my rebuttal.
I don't even? Your lack of logic is astounding..Blue Bomber wrote:qig was so quick to post my message and draw all attention to me over what I did. Although it was my fault for sounding suspicious, it also makes me believe that qig as drawing all attention to me so that he may remain in the shadows.
I think PaperPlayerX is trying to do damage control but he is making it incredibly obvious at this point that he isn't a vanilla townie.
Oh and that post qig made earlier he was directly defending PaperPlayerX as if they were part of a team or group.
My guess is that qig and PaperPlayerX are Mafia and we should consider their actions and get them lynched before they cause any trouble.
qig wrote:I don't even? Your lack of logic is astounding..Blue Bomber wrote:qig was so quick to post my message and draw all attention to me over what I did. Although it was my fault for sounding suspicious, it also makes me believe that qig as drawing all attention to me so that he may remain in the shadows.
I think PaperPlayerX is trying to do damage control but he is making it incredibly obvious at this point that he isn't a vanilla townie.
Oh and that post qig made earlier he was directly defending PaperPlayerX as if they were part of a team or group.
My guess is that qig and PaperPlayerX are Mafia and we should consider their actions and get them lynched before they cause any trouble.
1)I posted your message because you wanted to RUIN THE MAFIA GAME BY RIGGING THE RESULTS. I'm drawing attention to you because you want to fucking ruin the game, it has nothing to do with wanting to "stay in the shadows". If I wanted to stay in the shadows, I wouldn't be one of the most active members in the thread. There's people who haven't posted at all in this thread, those are the people staying in the shadows, not myself.
1) I never "directly defended PaperPlayerX", I pointed out that it's ridiculous to claim that someone is Mafia based on the fact that they sent PMs. That's shaky evidence at best, and meaningless at worst.