Page 11 of 12

Re: M44: Midnight on the Docks (DAY 4)

Posted: Sun Sep 24, 2017 3:41 pm
by Sevennights
You only got me on the fact that i thought mech was scum, which they acted way too scummy for my tastes, that is why i tried to lynch them day 2. Also who was lynched d3?
oh it was xdestroy. Between that time frame i was in school so you actually cant really blame me there. i dont check in early in the morning and i play games at night. I check the fourms when metioned or when i have time. considering i might have went to sleep around day 3 thats a good idea.
so forgive me for being absent.

Re: M44: Midnight on the Docks (DAY 4)

Posted: Sun Sep 24, 2017 3:42 pm
by Sevennights
I don't think danny will say anyways considering thge fact we got a lynch or lose sitiuation. So the chances of that being clarified is little to none. We have to go with guesses here i think

Re: M44: Midnight on the Docks (DAY 4)

Posted: Sun Sep 24, 2017 3:45 pm
by 116taj
I'm going to guess he flips green, because that's the color he is at the start of the game and probably until the end.

Re: M44: Midnight on the Docks (DAY 4)

Posted: Sun Sep 24, 2017 3:46 pm
by TDK
116taj wrote: Warlock isn't in the clear yet, we don't have clarification if the acolyte flips blue of green.
Good point.

If the acolyte flips blue after the seer dies, then Warlock is in the clear.
If the acolyte flips green after the seer dies, then Warlock is the last wolf.

Re: M44: Midnight on the Docks (DAY 4)

Posted: Sun Sep 24, 2017 3:49 pm
by TDK
Nanaya Jacob wrote:You only got me on the fact that i thought mech was scum, which they acted way too scummy for my tastes, that is why i tried to lynch them day 2. Also who was lynched d3?
oh it was xdestroy. Between that time frame i was in school so you actually cant really blame me there. i dont check in early in the morning and i play games at night. I check the fourms when metioned or when i have time. considering i might have went to sleep around day 3 thats a good idea.
so forgive me for being absent.
I suppose my reasoning for day 3 was rather poor, it did end early.

Still, you were rather quick to vote Mech in day 2.

Re: M44: Midnight on the Docks (DAY 4)

Posted: Sun Sep 24, 2017 3:54 pm
by TDK
TheDinoKing wrote:
116taj wrote: Warlock isn't in the clear yet, we don't have clarification if the acolyte flips blue of green.
Good point.

If the acolyte flips blue after the seer dies, then Warlock is in the clear.
If the acolyte flips green after the seer dies, then Warlock is the last wolf.
Got confirmation that the acolyte flips blue after the seer dies.

So Warlock is confirmed to be the huntsman.

Re: M44: Midnight on the Docks (DAY 4)

Posted: Sun Sep 24, 2017 3:59 pm
by Sevennights
I did not like mech claimed i believe they claimed at night and i wondered how they lived or even why no one counter claimed considering a blue did die. So my toughts were that mech was scum of some sort. Also considerig how mech acted thats rather bad.

Also from what the dan man said, the acolyte becomes blue when the seer dies. This means that warlock's huntsman claim seems more fair now

Re: M44: Midnight on the Docks (DAY 4)

Posted: Sun Sep 24, 2017 3:59 pm
by Sevennights
116taj, this means you warlock might have actually tried to kill you. This deserves an explaination

Re: M44: Midnight on the Docks (DAY 4)

Posted: Sun Sep 24, 2017 4:14 pm
by 116taj
Alright that's it. It's time to speak up here. I am the huntsman. I didn't want to say it but considering you guys are letting warlock of the hook, I had to say it.
the first night i decided to kill a random player because this was the first time i was a special and thought that's what you're supposed to do. then I got called out for killing night 1 and decided to not kill anyone after that (including xdestroy) because I thought it would cost us the game so I stayed silent and decided it was better to not nightkill anyone. I didn't claim earlier because I didn't want to be killed for no reason. Also why I tried to make a blue alliance so I could make my ability useful.
And as for warlock claiming to nightkill me but i was protected, how are you sure? no protection message showed up and he is only claiming to have nightkilled players he suspects right now (tdk and me) doesn't that seem a bit odd? So basically, I'm the huntsman and warlock is fake claiming so he can stay out of suspicion.

Re: M44: Midnight on the Docks (DAY 4)

Posted: Sun Sep 24, 2017 4:17 pm
by 116taj
And with that, I'm going to vote Warlock

Re: M44: Midnight on the Docks (DAY 4)

Posted: Sun Sep 24, 2017 4:18 pm
by Sevennights
Now hold the fuck up.
Now, if you were the huntsman you should have claimed, both of you, eariler if possible. Claiming right now is bullshit. Now its between you two fools, and considering the two of you suspect each other the fuck.

Re: M44: Midnight on the Docks (DAY 4)

Posted: Sun Sep 24, 2017 4:20 pm
by 116taj
Nanaya Jacob wrote:Now hold the fuck up.
Now, if you were the huntsman you should have claimed, both of you, eariler if possible. Claiming right now is bullshit. Now its between you two fools, and considering the two of you suspect each other the fuck.
I'm sorry for not claiming earlier, but I didn't want to be nightkilled by the stranger or the werewolves.

Re: M44: Midnight on the Docks (DAY 4)

Posted: Sun Sep 24, 2017 4:26 pm
by Sevennights
im leaning on lynching taj rn, taj has been rather helpful as a town tho
and
warlock made the claim first
but what have they down to help the town


this is rather bad situation

Re: M44: Midnight on the Docks (DAY 4)

Posted: Sun Sep 24, 2017 4:27 pm
by Warlock
116taj wrote:
TheDinoKing wrote:Thanks for the claims.
So here's my suspicion list.

Warlock: There's only one blue left and he's the only one that claimed blue. So that means he's in the clear.
116taj: Tried to help find leads, and has been somewhat pro-town, although he has been bandwagoning sometimes. So I'm not sure.
Jacob: Probably who I have to say is the last werewolf. Tried to get Mechdragon (a potential blue) lynched on D2 and was absent when another werewolf was getting lynched on D3.
Warlock isn't in the clear yet, we don't have clarification if the acolyte flips blue of green.
The Acolyte becomes the Seer when the Seer dies so he cardflips blue.

Re: M44: Midnight on the Docks (DAY 4)

Posted: Sun Sep 24, 2017 4:28 pm
by TDK
116taj wrote:
Nanaya Jacob wrote:Now hold the fuck up.
Now, if you were the huntsman you should have claimed, both of you, eariler if possible. Claiming right now is bullshit. Now its between you two fools, and considering the two of you suspect each other the fuck.
I'm sorry for not claiming earlier, but I didn't want to be nightkilled by the stranger or the werewolves.
You should have realised that either this phase or the next is the last one, so nightkill isn't a issue.
So there was no point of not honestly claiming, unless you're the werewolf.

Re: M44: Midnight on the Docks (DAY 4)

Posted: Sun Sep 24, 2017 4:28 pm
by Warlock
116taj wrote:Alright that's it. It's time to speak up here. I am the huntsman. I didn't want to say it but considering you guys are letting warlock of the hook, I had to say it.
the first night i decided to kill a random player because this was the first time i was a special and thought that's what you're supposed to do. then I got called out for killing night 1 and decided to not kill anyone after that (including xdestroy) because I thought it would cost us the game so I stayed silent and decided it was better to not nightkill anyone. I didn't claim earlier because I didn't want to be killed for no reason. Also why I tried to make a blue alliance so I could make my ability useful.
And as for warlock claiming to nightkill me but i was protected, how are you sure? no protection message showed up and he is only claiming to have nightkilled players he suspects right now (tdk and me) doesn't that seem a bit odd? So basically, I'm the huntsman and warlock is fake claiming so he can stay out of suspicion.
Because Danny sent me a PM saying it was cancelled.

Re: M44: Midnight on the Docks (DAY 4)

Posted: Sun Sep 24, 2017 4:29 pm
by TDK
Warlock wrote: ping
116taj wrote: ping
Both of you say who you killed each night phase and your reason for killing.

Re: M44: Midnight on the Docks (DAY 4)

Posted: Sun Sep 24, 2017 4:33 pm
by 116taj
TheDinoKing wrote:
Warlock wrote: ping
116taj wrote: ping
Both of you say who you killed each night phase and your reason for killing.
Like I said, I only killed night 1.
Night 1 kill: Cedur

Re: M44: Midnight on the Docks (DAY 4)

Posted: Sun Sep 24, 2017 4:34 pm
by Warlock
Let's go over my kills now, right?

N1: Pseudo - It was a rather risky move but It seems to have paid off. Not too experienced with Mafia on these forums tbh (not that it justified killing on the first night).
N2: No Kill. - Didn't have enough leads to justify a kill. Also took some feedback from other players saying the N1 kill was a risky move.
N3: 166taj (Failed) - He seemed fairly suspicious to be honest, plus I was aware the xDestroy was either going to die N3 or be lynched D3, which is why I never went for him.
N4: TheDinoKing (Failed) - He was one of my top suspects at the time, however nobody really mentioned it so I thought I'd take the chance. Obviously that never worked as the wave happened.

Re: M44: Midnight on the Docks (DAY 4)

Posted: Sun Sep 24, 2017 4:45 pm
by TDK
Warlock, your kill attempt claims keep on contradicting each other.
So either you're the last werewolf or you have a bad memory.