Re: SMBX 1.3.0.1
Posted: Tue Aug 05, 2014 1:21 pm
Yep. Lets wait cause im very patient 

Well, if he will do with Terraria graphics, even with the same gameplay it won't be SMBX related.Bryux wrote:You guys do know that Redigit is working on a sort of 'sequel' to SMBX, right? With Terraria graphics instead of Mario graphics.
So there is technically going to be a NSMBX.
Pseudo-dino wrote:I don't think that "Super X", as it's often called, has actually been officially confirmed by Redigit. There were rumors about him saying such a thing a few years ago but if I remember correctly they were never confirmed outright.
It's not though, and until any verification of what's going on in Pixels' screenshot is brought up, keep the discussion in that thread.
I wasn't saying Joey put flesh-eating viruses in SMBX 1.3.0.1, I was just saying that a thread was made about it.GhostHawk wrote:It's not though, and until any verification of what's going on in Pixels' screenshot is brought up, keep the discussion in that thread.
I understand, but it needed to be said in case anybody wants to derail this topic with accusations. Sorry if you misinterpreted. :/SMBXxer wrote:I wasn't saying Joey put flesh-eating viruses in SMBX 1.3.0.1, I was just saying that a thread was made about it.GhostHawk wrote:It's not though, and until any verification of what's going on in Pixels' screenshot is brought up, keep the discussion in that thread.
no it isn'tpeople wrote:this is a thing
I'm saying that the THREAD is a thing, not the virus.Joey wrote:no it isn'tpeople wrote:this is a thing
If the images are real, then, it's not.Joey wrote:Pretty ridiculous thread, if you ask me.
Um...Joey wrote:Whether or not the images are real or fake has nothing to do with the validity of the ridiculous argument being presented in that thread.
It doesn't say YOU directly might have done it, it's just saying that someone might have done it.Joey wrote:No, it actually doesn't.
The notion that I would put backdoor trojans in SMBX 1.3.0.1 is stupid. Please keep that discussion out of here.
This is why I said keep the discussion in the other thread. Anyways, it's already been confirmed to not be a trojan or a backdoor.SMBXxer wrote:It doesn't say YOU directly might have done it, it's just saying that someone might have done it.Joey wrote:No, it actually doesn't.
The notion that I would put backdoor trojans in SMBX 1.3.0.1 is stupid. Please keep that discussion out of here.