SMBX 1.3.0.1

maxbrine · Postby **maxbrine** » Tue Aug 05, 2014 1:21 pm

Yep. Lets wait cause im very patient

RudeGuy · Postby **RudeGuy** » Tue Aug 05, 2014 1:30 pm

Since Redigit (creator of SMBX) doesn't care anymore about SMBX, there won't be any future updates apart the one which have Luna.DLL. So...No NSMBX or something like this.

maxbrine · Postby **maxbrine** » Tue Aug 05, 2014 1:36 pm

Ok.

Ive just got so many to ask but im gonna not be annoying if possible.

I just need to know that how do you upload maps ?

Bryux · Postby **Bryux** » Tue Aug 05, 2014 5:57 pm

You guys do know that Redigit is working on a sort of 'sequel' to SMBX, right? With Terraria graphics instead of Mario graphics.

So there is technically going to be a NSMBX.

BMatSantos · Postby **BMatSantos** » Tue Aug 05, 2014 6:01 pm

Bryux wrote:You guys do know that Redigit is working on a sort of 'sequel' to SMBX, right? With Terraria graphics instead of Mario graphics.

So there is technically going to be a NSMBX.

Well, if he will do with Terraria graphics, even with the same gameplay it won't be SMBX related.

Postby **Julia Pseudo** » Tue Aug 05, 2014 7:27 pm

I don't think that "Super X", as it's often called, has actually been officially confirmed by Redigit. There were rumors about him saying such a thing a few years ago but if I remember correctly they were never confirmed outright.

Darkonius Mavakar · Postby **Darkonius Mavakar** » Tue Aug 05, 2014 7:31 pm

Pseudo-dino wrote:I don't think that "Super X", as it's often called, has actually been officially confirmed by Redigit. There were rumors about him saying such a thing a few years ago but if I remember correctly they were never confirmed outright.

you know that Redigit's a master troller uh?

...do i have to ask Knux and the other peeps the IRC quotes?...

SMBXxer · Postby **SMBXxer** » Wed Aug 06, 2014 6:40 pm

Soooo....
http://knuckles96.prophpbb.com/topic16419.html
This is a thing.

aero · Postby **aero** » Wed Aug 06, 2014 6:53 pm

SMBXxer wrote:Soooo....
http://knuckles96.prophpbb.com/topic16419.html
This is a thing.

It's not though, and until any verification of what's going on in Pixels' screenshot is brought up, keep the discussion in that thread.

SMBXxer · Postby **SMBXxer** » Wed Aug 06, 2014 7:00 pm

GhostHawk wrote:
SMBXxer wrote:Soooo....
http://knuckles96.prophpbb.com/topic16419.html
This is a thing.
It's not though, and until any verification of what's going on in Pixels' screenshot is brought up, keep the discussion in that thread.

I wasn't saying Joey put flesh-eating viruses in SMBX 1.3.0.1, I was just saying that a thread was made about it.

aero · Postby **aero** » Wed Aug 06, 2014 7:15 pm

SMBXxer wrote:
GhostHawk wrote:
SMBXxer wrote:Soooo....
http://knuckles96.prophpbb.com/topic16419.html
This is a thing.
It's not though, and until any verification of what's going on in Pixels' screenshot is brought up, keep the discussion in that thread.
I wasn't saying Joey put flesh-eating viruses in SMBX 1.3.0.1, I was just saying that a thread was made about it.

I understand, but it needed to be said in case anybody wants to derail this topic with accusations. Sorry if you misinterpreted. :/

Postby **Shadow Yoshi** » Wed Aug 06, 2014 11:46 pm

people wrote:this is a thing

no it isn't

SMBXxer · Postby **SMBXxer** » Thu Aug 07, 2014 12:27 am

Joey wrote:
people wrote:this is a thing
no it isn't

I'm saying that the THREAD is a thing, not the virus.

Postby **Shadow Yoshi** » Thu Aug 07, 2014 12:55 am

Pretty ridiculous thread, if you ask me.

SMBXxer · Postby **SMBXxer** » Thu Aug 07, 2014 1:03 am

Joey wrote:Pretty ridiculous thread, if you ask me.

If the images are real, then, it's not.
If they are fake, then he's just doing it for attention.

Postby **Shadow Yoshi** » Thu Aug 07, 2014 1:11 am

Whether or not the images are real or fake has nothing to do with the validity of the ridiculous argument being presented in that thread.

SMBXxer · Postby **SMBXxer** » Thu Aug 07, 2014 1:36 am

Joey wrote:Whether or not the images are real or fake has nothing to do with the validity of the ridiculous argument being presented in that thread.

Um...
Yes, it does.

Postby **Shadow Yoshi** » Thu Aug 07, 2014 10:08 am

No, it actually doesn't.

The notion that I would put backdoor trojans in SMBX 1.3.0.1 is stupid. Please keep that discussion out of here.

SMBXxer · Postby **SMBXxer** » Thu Aug 07, 2014 6:02 pm

Joey wrote:No, it actually doesn't.

The notion that I would put backdoor trojans in SMBX 1.3.0.1 is stupid. Please keep that discussion out of here.

It doesn't say YOU directly might have done it, it's just saying that someone might have done it.

aero · Postby **aero** » Thu Aug 07, 2014 6:33 pm

SMBXxer wrote:
Joey wrote:No, it actually doesn't.

The notion that I would put backdoor trojans in SMBX 1.3.0.1 is stupid. Please keep that discussion out of here.
It doesn't say YOU directly might have done it, it's just saying that someone might have done it.

This is why I said keep the discussion in the other thread. Anyways, it's already been confirmed to not be a trojan or a backdoor.