Super Mario Bros. X Forums

Forums for SMBX
https://www.smbxgame.com/forums/

The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

https://www.smbxgame.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=13185

Page 2 of 9

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2016 12:42 pm
by Ness-Wednesday
Linik wrote:Well, I have just decreased the size of my signature. What do you think of it now?
To be honest, I kinda liked the science guy gif thing in your signature rather than you saying "previously known as castlewars".

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2016 1:32 pm
by Hani
At least I still love my signature. D: But seriously, good thin I ain't in the top 25.

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2016 2:48 pm
by Imaynotbehere4long
Horikawa Otane wrote:39. Size: 503px - Imaynotbehere4long
To be fair, once Super Mario and the Pile of Motely Levels finally bombs in a few months, I'll remove that bit from my sig, decreasing it by 178 pixels. Doing this will also give me enough characters to put my all-time favorite quote from the forums in a spoiler, decreasing it by another 81 pixels. Until then, there's not much I can do aside from hope that my collabs don't fail.

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2016 3:07 pm
by Ecruteak
I'm so confused

what

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2016 3:57 pm
by Gameinsky
tl;dr if you're in the top 50 you should probably consider shortening it either by using spoilers or just trimming some of the huge images away.

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2016 4:16 pm
by JupiHornet
DAT LUIGI FAN once had the worst signature ever, it was literally 3 YouTube videos with no spoiler ;A;

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2016 4:33 pm
by Sewpah
This is the only time I'll be in a Top 10. I'm so honored.

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2016 4:47 pm
by aero
It's 2016 and people still have signatures enabled on SMBX?

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2016 4:52 pm
by HeroLinik
AeroMatter wrote:It's 2016 and people still have signatures enabled on SMBX?
Says the person that has a signature.

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2016 4:53 pm
by HenryRichard
How am I not on this

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2016 4:54 pm
by TDK
HenryRichard wrote:How am I not on this
You signature isn't bad enough.

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2016 4:55 pm
by aero
Linik wrote:
AeroMatter wrote:It's 2016 and people still have signatures enabled on SMBX?
Says the person that has a signature.
Image

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reading_comprehension

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2016 4:56 pm
by Sevennights
What have you done Snake !? You created a time pardox!

No really that's p insane
Have large signatures, (I'm probably on there but i might what ever) is p common here that is somewhat not really, hurts...

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2016 6:36 pm
by Matt_The_Slime
oh wow I made it on the list oh man

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2016 6:37 pm
by The Thwomp King
Horikawa Otane wrote:

THE 100 WORST SIGNATURES ON SMBX FORUMS

So we all know that SMBX Forum is commonly known for one thing - ENORMOUS signatures. So yesterday, I took it upon myself to write a little program to take a look at EVERYONE'S signature, measure its height, and report them.

My methodology was to render the page using webkit at a resolution of 1920x1080, calculate the vertical size of the signature itself (keeping spoiled content spoiled and ignoring the margins, etc. of the parent nodes) based on the user profile page, and then input them into a little list. You can download the full list here for your own data analysis. It's up to date as of 2/16/2016 @6am EST. Also interesting to note, of the 8,464 user id slots registered, only 3,940 are occupied by users currently. The rest have either been deleted or something else (probably spam bots). So as of 2/16/2016 @6am EST, SMBX forums has 3,940 registered users.

I will also ping all of you "winners" to claim a userbar to make your already awful signatures even worse!!!!

"Victory" userbar
Image
Alternative "victory" userbar:

Spoiler: show
Image
[/center]

FROM BIGGEST TO SMALLEST
  1. Size: 1056px - MegaCDFan235
  2. Size: 905px - DrPac
  3. Size: 868px - Pop Yoshi Bros
  4. Size: 866px - TheRulerOfOats
  5. Size: 835px - UnskilledPlayer
  6. Size: 787px - LoZFTW
  7. Size: 758px - luckyloomagu
  8. Size: 752px - Sewpah
  9. Size: 739px - OrangeQuilavaBurst29
  10. Size: 717px - xtremegamer51
  11. Size: 700px - CraZyBoY69
  12. Size: 694px - Clawson263
  13. Size: 680px - PikaChris
  14. Size: 669px - TheDinoKing432
  15. Size: 666px - Terminal 7
  16. Size: 665px - VeryOriginalName
  17. Size: 660px - lucascio13
  18. Size: 657px - JeffTheSpiny
  19. Size: 648px - bossedit8
  20. Size: 632px - Anikilador298Returns
  21. Size: 627px - Dr Luigi
  22. Size: 621px - MegamanK
  23. Size: 615px - Jdude60
  24. Size: 611px - The Enoch
  25. Size: 605px - JuniorPlayer
  26. Size: 592px - MrPunchia
  27. Size: 587px - DarkPhil
  28. Size: 575px - Catastrophe
  29. Size: 574px - Redigitisawesome
  30. Size: 559px - Harvey36Dice
  31. Size: 558px - Ness-Wednesday
  32. Size: 544px - Vankus
  33. Size: 543px - Toad5x
  34. Size: 537px - MosaicMario
  35. Size: 527px - CalebDavidMcgee
  36. Size: 525px - Whales hey
  37. Size: 521px - DarkWolf658
  38. Size: 513px - Q P
  39. Size: 503px - Imaynotbehere4long
  40. Size: 498px - Linik
  41. Size: 496px - Egghead
  42. Size: 495px - Sednaiur
  43. Size: 495px - LuigiGamer
  44. Size: 489px - ShadowLabrys101
  45. Size: 482px - Cedrik
  46. Size: 481px - ShyGuyOfMoonside
  47. Size: 479px - TNTtimelord
  48. Size: 479px - HealthyMario
  49. Size: 475px - hvcjvd
  50. Size: 471px - SuperMarioBuilder16
  51. Size: 468px - Koopa-Fan
  52. Size: 466px - Cdymrtn
  53. Size: 465px - Seedy Koopas
  54. Size: 460px - mochila
  55. Size: 441px - Holo the Wise Wolf
  56. Size: 439px - penguin21
  57. Size: 438px - turtwig1123
  58. Size: 435px - Matt_The_Slime
  59. Size: 432px - The Thwomp King
  60. Size: 432px - PaperMarioFan
  61. Size: 432px - Noir-Ness
  62. Size: 428px - DeanTheKoopa
  63. Size: 426px - FastDasher
  64. Size: 424px - SuperLuigiBrother
  65. Size: 420px - hacheipe399
  66. Size: 419px - lighthouse64
  67. Size: 415px - auto2112
  68. Size: 414px - Kley
  69. Size: 413px - SamyPlaysSMBX
  70. Size: 410px - MightyMerlinStyle
  71. Size: 408px - icemario12
  72. Size: 404px - DimitrisPowerSeven
  73. Size: 396px - AxelVoss
  74. Size: 395px - Kyogre
  75. Size: 394px - EpicMarioBro
  76. Size: 393px - SuperToad202
  77. Size: 393px - JoseOtawio
  78. Size: 392px - Mister Boo
  79. Size: 391px - KFCMARIO
  80. Size: 388px - Luigimario280
  81. Size: 387px - Melting Terminal
  82. Size: 385px - Yumetaro
  83. Size: 382px - xUndefine
  84. Size: 382px - Sirmentio
  85. Size: 381px - -JK9000
  86. Size: 380px - Natsu
  87. Size: 379px - Super Phanto
  88. Size: 377px - braineat
  89. Size: 375px - 8bitmushroom
  90. Size: 373px - Alex48
  91. Size: 372px - Spark
  92. Size: 371px - Sux
  93. Size: 371px - Legend-tony980
  94. Size: 367px - Luxuria
  95. Size: 365px - Tinkerbell
  96. Size: 365px - Mudkip
  97. Size: 363px - Metroidologist X7
  98. Size: 358px - Sibel
  99. Size: 358px - BlueSpider
  100. Size: 354px - Krabby_Mokou
Ping time...
Spoiler: show
Krabby_Mokou wrote:PING
BlueSpider wrote:PING
Sibel wrote:PING
Metroidologist X7 wrote:PING
Mudkip wrote:PING
Tinkerbell wrote:PING
Luxuria wrote:PING
Legend-tony980 wrote:PING
Sux wrote:PING
Spark wrote:PING
Alex48 wrote:PING
8bitmushroom wrote:PING
braineat wrote:PING
Super Phanto wrote:PING
Natsu wrote:PING
-JK9000 wrote:PING
Sirmentio wrote:PING
xUndefine wrote:PING
Yumetaro wrote:PING
Melting Terminal wrote:PING
Luigimario280 wrote:PING
KFCMARIO wrote:PING
Mister Boo wrote:PING
JoseOtawio wrote:PING
SuperToad202 wrote:PING
EpicMarioBro wrote:PING
Kyogre wrote:PING
AxelVoss wrote:PING
DimitrisPowerSeven wrote:PING
icemario12 wrote:PING
MightyMerlinStyle wrote:PING
SamyPlaysSMBX wrote:PING
Kley wrote:PING
auto2112 wrote:PING
lighthouse64 wrote:PING
hacheipe399 wrote:PING
SuperLuigiBrother wrote:PING
FastDasher wrote:PING
DeanTheKoopa wrote:PING
Noir-Ness wrote:PING
PaperMarioFan wrote:PING
The Thwomp King wrote:PING
Matt_The_Slime wrote:PING
turtwig1123 wrote:PING
penguin21 wrote:PING
Holo the Wise Wolf wrote:PING
mochila wrote:PING
Seedy Koopas wrote:PING
Cdymrtn wrote:PING
Koopa-Fan wrote:PING
SuperMarioBuilder16 wrote:PING
hvcjvd wrote:PING
HealthyMario wrote:PING
TNTtimelord wrote:PING
ShyGuyOfMoonside wrote:PING
Cedrik wrote:PING
ShadowLabrys101 wrote:PING
LuigiGamer wrote:PING
Sednaiur wrote:PING
Egghead wrote:PING
Linik wrote:PING
Imaynotbehere4long wrote:PING
Q P wrote:PING
DarkWolf658 wrote:PING
Whales hey wrote:PING
CalebDavidMcgee wrote:PING
MosaicMario wrote:PING
Toad5x wrote:PING
Vankus wrote:PING
Ness-Wednesday wrote:PING
Harvey36Dice wrote:PING
Redigitisawesome wrote:PING
Catastrophe wrote:PING
DarkPhil wrote:PING
MrPunchia wrote:PING
JuniorPlayer wrote:PING
The Enoch wrote:PING
Jdude60 wrote:PING
MegamanK wrote:PING
Dr Luigi wrote:PING
Anikilador298Returns wrote:PING
bossedit8 wrote:PING
JeffTheSpiny wrote:PING
lucascio13 wrote:PING
VeryOriginalName wrote:PING
Terminal 7 wrote:PING
TheDinoKing432 wrote:PING
PikaChris wrote:PING
Clawson263 wrote:PING
CraZyBoY69 wrote:PING
xtremegamer51 wrote:PING
OrangeQuilavaBurst29 wrote:PING
Sewpah wrote:PING
luckyloomagu wrote:PING
LoZFTW wrote:PING
UnskilledPlayer wrote:PING
TheRulerOfOats wrote:PING
Pop Yoshi Bros wrote:PING
DrPac wrote:PING
MegaCDFan235 wrote:PING
Should I be offended or proud? XD hahaha

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2016 6:53 pm
by Enchlore
The needlessly tall signatures annoyed the heck out of me, too, which is why I disabled signature displaying. It's good to see it's being brought up here.

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2016 6:53 pm
by underFlo
Well considering how you literally quoted the whole op you seem to like inflating your posts, and I'm not sure if that's something to be proud of.

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2016 7:10 pm
by Emral
The Thwomp King wrote: Should I be offended or proud? XD hahaha
oh my god did you just ping everyone again

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2016 7:33 pm
by The Thwomp King
Enjl wrote:
The Thwomp King wrote: Should I be offended or proud? XD hahaha
oh my god did you just ping everyone again
Oops. Sorry about that!

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2016 7:47 pm
by CopyLeft
i feel so special
now time to make signature smaller
All times are UTC-04:00
Page 2 of 9
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
https://www.phpbb.com/