Joey wrote:Users letting threads die is not moderation. It's just what you're supposed to do - kind of like how you're supposed to post screenshots with your levels, not insult other users, etc.
Also, let me make a distinction here:
- The threads created by Quill and me that Aero used as an example are joke topics. Are they shitposts as well? Some may think so, sure, but they're harmless.
- The threads created by Vinyl that Aero used as an example are shitposts. Are they joke topics as well? Yeah, I suppose, but Vinyl has a bad reputation and therefore it's inappropriate for him to be making such topics. Also, those topics were created out of protest anyway, so that example is completely different and not applicable to the point I'm making.
I don't see why this is so hard to understand.
top definition on UD wrote:shitpost
To make utterly worthless and inane posts on an internet messageboard.
(you can't deny the source because it's "unreliable", as it's the most reliable source for terms like these, which don't have dictionary-accepted definitions)
And, going by your scenario, if an user has a good reputation it's fine for them to shitpost, but if they have a bad reputation, it's inappropiate.
Even if they were made in
indirect protest, that shit only concerned vinyl-the staff, unless i'm missing something, there was no public statement (until now) of them being made in protest, which leaves them on the same level of shitposting as
this thread to any other user.