Page 81 of 87
Re: Site Discussion Thread
Posted: Tue Nov 08, 2016 6:48 pm
by Mable
Enjl wrote:Mable wrote:Smb3 is overused here, and this SMB3 everything legacy needs to die out.
How DARE you say that. You KNOW this style was the one used by the original SMBX forums, therefore it is the ONE AND ONLY OPTION and shall NEVER be questioned. I am deeply offended by your ignorance and rudeness. If you can't accept the status quo, just don't say anything.
How dare people have different tastes and opinions????
Nice Sarcasm tho
Re: Site Discussion Thread
Posted: Thu Nov 10, 2016 9:17 pm
by RPG_Magician
Can we get something like an approval system for episodes? Kinda sick of people posting nothing or incomplete projects in the Episode forums.
Although this is just a minor issue imo.
Re: Site Discussion Thread
Posted: Thu Nov 10, 2016 9:34 pm
by PixelPest
RPG_MagicianBot wrote:Can we get something like an approval system for episodes? Kinda sick of people posting nothing or incomplete projects in the Episode forums.
Although this is just a minor issue imo.
That's the point of the report button. Report a post and the Mods or Admins will take care of it
Re: Site Discussion Thread
Posted: Thu Nov 10, 2016 9:52 pm
by RPG_Magician
PixelPest wrote:RPG_MagicianBot wrote:Can we get something like an approval system for episodes? Kinda sick of people posting nothing or incomplete projects in the Episode forums.
Although this is just a minor issue imo.
That's the point of the report button. Report a post and the Mods or Admins will take care of it
P-people actually use the Report button?!
T-This is a first for me..
Although on the more serious side, I guess I'll use it more often (not that I've used it ever). Thanks
Re: Site Discussion Thread
Posted: Fri Nov 11, 2016 3:17 am
by Cedur
An approval system for everyone would be more of a hassle (not only that it's tricky to code) because everyone posting legit episodes would have to wait for a mod to drop by and do the approval. Using the report button is the easier job indeed.
Re: Site Discussion Thread
Posted: Sat Nov 12, 2016 4:09 am
by Radiance
Bump. But that could be useless if the avatar is big enough to cover the status online.
Re: Site Discussion Thread
Posted: Sat Nov 12, 2016 8:57 am
by Cedur
Isn't the size limit (200x200) sufficient enough to leave the space for online status blank, at least in normal zoom?
Also, some polls allow you to change your vote while others don't. It would be good to know about that beforehand (with the text e.g. saying "you can choose [x] options and you can/can't change your vote").
Re: Site Discussion Thread
Posted: Sun Nov 20, 2016 3:28 pm
by Shadow Yoshi
The
Also, you can now specify a width and height of up to 1000 pixels.
http://www.stardustfields.net/files/reggie.png[/rimg]
Re: Site Discussion Thread
Posted: Sun Nov 20, 2016 4:00 pm
by underFlo
rip reggie
Re: Site Discussion Thread
Posted: Sun Nov 20, 2016 4:27 pm
by Danny
Is there any reason why you chose that insanely graphic picture in the first place? smh
Re: Site Discussion Thread
Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2016 3:15 am
by Cedur
I don't mind, I'm glad that this happened and it's especially useful for episode/project screenies and their obligatory dimensions.
Re: Site Discussion Thread
Posted: Tue Nov 22, 2016 4:19 pm
by ElectriKong
Syndrilevosse wrote:Is there any reason why you chose that insanely graphic picture in the first place? smh
Yeah I agree. An example relating to SMBX would have been better.
Re: Site Discussion Thread
Posted: Tue Nov 22, 2016 7:08 pm
by Danny
King of Eterity wrote:Syndrilevosse wrote:Is there any reason why you chose that insanely graphic picture in the first place? smh
Yeah I agree. An example relating to SMBX would have been better.
I was being sarcastic given the context of the image, but okay.
Re: Site Discussion Thread
Posted: Wed Nov 23, 2016 4:06 pm
by Cedur
Terrible spamming on the chat today. If it goes on like this I'm starting to lose enjoyment of the chat, because around today afternoon I "forcedly" disconnected just because of the people spamming, and if this goes on then I'll ultimately have to block people and have walls of "14 blocked messages" in a row and that's also an uncomfortable experience of chatting, really.
Members, please be aware that rules also apply on chat and if you shouldn't do something on the forums, you shouldn't do it on the chat either, and please know that spamming and being immature and disrupting chat is not your proper way to get attention (since this may be a possible motive, but believe it, you get much better attention for behaving well). Mods and chanops, please know that you're in place to enforce the rules, so it would be good to weed out walls of spam messages just as forum spam is also weeded out (I'm not sure if you have power for that), and you can also kick or ban people from the chat if it comes to extremes. I wanna rely on you to do more against this immaturity.
Re: Site Discussion Thread
Posted: Wed Nov 23, 2016 8:29 pm
by Zeldamaster12
Again, not your place to be giving lectures to people. Please stop doing that.
As for the spam, report it next time. If you have a problem with someone, then yes, you are free to block them.
Re: Site Discussion Thread
Posted: Thu Nov 24, 2016 2:24 am
by Emral
People having fun? On MY chat server? This cannot be!
Re: Site Discussion Thread
Posted: Thu Nov 24, 2016 12:52 pm
by Shadow Yoshi
Spoilers can now be named.
This is a normal spoiler.
This one is named "text". Use
Re: Site Discussion Thread
Posted: Thu Nov 24, 2016 1:06 pm
by Snessy the duck
Joey wrote:Spoilers can now be named.
This is a normal spoiler.
This one is named "text". Use
Yay! I remember this feature from the Mario Builder forums, glad to have it here! Will definetly be useful for screenshots!
Re: Site Discussion Thread
Posted: Thu Nov 24, 2016 3:12 pm
by Danny
But can we name a spoiler "spoiler"?
Re: Site Discussion Thread
Posted: Thu Nov 24, 2016 4:54 pm
by ElectriKong
Input example
Code: Select all
[spoiler=Example]Spoiler named example[/spoiler]
Output
Guess that will be useful in project and level topics especially.