Page 80 of 87

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2016 4:56 pm
by ParmaJon
I dont know if there was a reason for this, but smwcx is done and the thread "SMWCX - We need your help! " has been sticked for a while.

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Sat Oct 29, 2016 11:39 am
by Shadow Yoshi
Sorry for the downtime, y'all. All of the issues with downtime seem to be related to storage space on the server, so hopefully I can find a permanent or at least long-lasting fix.

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Sat Oct 29, 2016 12:04 pm
by Snessy the duck
So, basically a while back in this thread, there was a discussion about if the Online status text should be changed, which I think it should, as it's pretty bland as of now. And I just wanted to say that Enjl had a pretty good recommendation for a redesign!
Enjl wrote:How about this?
Not only does it fit the site's style better, it's also a bit more visible, which makes it easier to tell if a person is online or not, and having it show off/online is just prettier imo!

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Sun Oct 30, 2016 10:21 am
by Mable
This Storage Space thing sure happens every month huh? Is it still worth to mention anyway.?

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Sun Oct 30, 2016 10:51 am
by Shadow Yoshi
Well, at first I thought it was logfile buildup, so I started having those deleted daily and it seemed to fix it for a while (or at least make it not happen as often). This time, I went through and deleted a bunch of stuff I didn't need, so we'll see if we have the problem again soon.

I can maybe see about changing the on/offline icon but I don't see an issue with the way it is now.

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Sun Oct 30, 2016 10:52 am
by Cedur
I dig Enjl's switch block idea to display Online status. Hopefully we can have this.

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:41 pm
by Snessy the duck
So I did a little mockup on how the switch block idea would look like using supershrooms post! I think it looks pretty cool!
Spoiler: show
On:
Image
Off:
Image

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Sun Oct 30, 2016 3:46 pm
by aero
Why not instead of switch block cancer it was a Boo npc?

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Sun Oct 30, 2016 8:50 pm
by bossedit8
I mean we could have those switch blocks and maybe other images that has been suggested in it but I feel the "ONLINE" text whenever someone's online and a blank OFFLINE is already indicated enough to see if a member is online or not.

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Mon Oct 31, 2016 4:14 pm
by Emral
you see
the switch blocks would work really well with a smw theme ;)

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Mon Oct 31, 2016 6:17 pm
by aero
smw boo tho

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Mon Oct 31, 2016 9:51 pm
by PixelPest
SMB3 would look so much better.

Another possibility is SMB3 power-up block for online and the hit version for offline

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Tue Nov 01, 2016 12:12 pm
by Snessy the duck
Or how about a custom block with an internet symbol on it?

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Tue Nov 01, 2016 12:54 pm
by Mable
Smb3 is overused here, and this SMB3 everything legacy needs to die out.

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Tue Nov 01, 2016 1:00 pm
by Snessy the duck
Mable wrote:Smb3 is overused here, and this SMB3 everything legacy needs to die out.
Yeah, I agree! There's also alot of non-SMB3 styled icons on the site, such as the SMB1 cheep cheep for the chat, and the SMW turnblock for the quick links!

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Sun Nov 06, 2016 1:09 pm
by Cedur
Something I've been wondering myself for long: Isn't Mafia worth to be on the board index, without being a subforum of the wide-ranged Sandbox? Putting Mafia on the board index could maybe spark a little bit more attention to it.

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Sun Nov 06, 2016 1:58 pm
by Emral
Mable wrote:Smb3 is overused here, and this SMB3 everything legacy needs to die out.
How DARE you say that. You KNOW this style was the one used by the original SMBX forums, therefore it is the ONE AND ONLY OPTION and shall NEVER be questioned. I am deeply offended by your ignorance and rudeness. If you can't accept the status quo, just don't say anything.

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Sun Nov 06, 2016 5:09 pm
by HeroLinik
Supershroom wrote:Something I've been wondering myself for long: Isn't Mafia worth to be on the board index, without being a subforum of the wide-ranged Sandbox? Putting Mafia on the board index could maybe spark a little bit more attention to it.
Erm, I'm pretty sure it already is.

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Sun Nov 06, 2016 8:24 pm
by Sevennights
Linik wrote: Erm, I'm pretty sure it already is.
If you mean shows as a sub fourm on the board index no, that's not showing it as its own fourm not sub fourm
In turn you meant sub fourm, while supershroom meant its own fourm. This will diffuse the two ad sandbox is nearly endless, and will.make the small.community of mafis grow to be more pf a larger community, forgive me if i was at all rude during this but the remark you made felt someone saying we should now make it into a.fourm and it should die type of tone.
Other words yes, i might be better to its own fourm but chances are, that is not going to happen.

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Sun Nov 06, 2016 8:42 pm
by aero
Nanaya Jacob wrote:If you mean shows as a sub fourm on the board index no, that's not showing it as its own fourm not sub fourm
In turn you meant sub fourm, while supershroom meant its own fourm. This will diffuse the two ad sandbox is nearly endless, and will.make the small.community of mafis grow to be more pf a larger community, forgive me if i was at all rude during this but the remark you made felt someone saying we should now make it into a.fourm and it should die type of tone.
Other words yes, i might be better to its own fourm but chances are, that is not going to happen.
This is an English forum.