Page 8 of 18
Re: Super Smash Bros. Roster
Posted: Tue May 06, 2014 11:39 am
by qig
Re: Super Smash Bros. Roster
Posted: Tue May 06, 2014 11:48 am
by Super Luigi!
Exactly my point. Your grammar skills are as good as my reading ability. Interpret that any way you want.
Many of the characters on the roster seem to possess different fighting styles. Take Rosalina for example, who uses Luma to help fight alongside and for her. One of my friends tells me she's going to be his new main fighter. Personally, I'm more of a Luigi fan myself, but Little Mac and Villager have caught my eye. One question I have: If the 3DS version has Smash Run, what does the Wii U obtain in exchange, if anything?
Re: Super Smash Bros. Roster
Posted: Tue May 06, 2014 11:59 am
by qig
Super Luigi! wrote:Exactly my point. Your grammar skills are as good as my reading ability. Interpret that any way you want.
Many of the characters on the roster seem to possess different fighting styles. Take Rosalina for example, who uses Luma to help fight alongside and for her. One of my friends tells me she's going to be his new main fighter. Personally, I'm more of a Luigi fan myself, but Little Mac and Villager have caught my eye. One question I have: If the 3DS version has Smash Run, what does the Wii U obtain in exchange, if anything?
you don't seem to realize my grammar skills on this forum are a conscious choice, not a reflection of my intelligence. you on the other hand....
Re: Super Smash Bros. Roster
Posted: Tue May 06, 2014 12:26 pm
by Tepig2000
Nien wrote:
Nice, lip has apparently potential to be in the game because people posted a bunch of shit in a message baord.
i like your claims.
PS: I'm pretty sure panel de pon is nowhere near being a really succesful puzzle game
These people didn't post shit, they discussed inteligently how Lip could be unique. And since when does appearing in a successfull game matters? If Sakurai picked characters based on sales the roster would be 80% Mario, 15% Pokemon and 5% Zelda.
Re: Super Smash Bros. Roster
Posted: Tue May 06, 2014 3:47 pm
by MistakesWereMade
Super Luigi! wrote:Exactly my point. Your grammar skills are as good as my reading ability. Interpret that any way you want.
My interpretation of that, is:
"Lol, you have poor capitalization, i'm going to defend my poor skill to understand the main point of a piece of text by comparing it to something that is totally related with comprehension"
Re: Super Smash Bros. Roster
Posted: Tue May 06, 2014 4:09 pm
by Super Luigi!
qig wrote:you don't seem to realize my grammar skills on this forum are a conscious choice, not a reflection of my intelligence. you on the other hand....
I haven't said anything about your intelligence. On the contrary, I'm sure there's a well thought-out purpose behind every action you carry out.
Nien wrote:My interpretation of that, is:
"Lol, you have poor capitalization, i'm going to defend my poor skill to understand the main point of a piece of text by comparing it to something that is totally related with comprehension"
If that's how you see my words, then so be it. After all, I'm not here to change anyone's mind, just to express my own. Now, can we please return to our Smash Bros. Roster discussion?
It will be interesting to see if any additional characters end up as costumes for existing fighters, such as Shadow, Female Villager, or Roll.
Re: Super Smash Bros. Roster
Posted: Tue May 06, 2014 4:22 pm
by Ignoritus
Tepig2000 wrote:
These people didn't post shit, they discussed inteligently how Lip could be unique. And since when does appearing in a successfull game matters? If Sakurai picked characters based on sales the roster would be 80% Mario, 15% Pokemon and 5% Zelda.
Do you know what an asstatistic is?
Hint: It's named after the place you pull it out of.
Super Luigi! wrote:Exactly my point. Your grammar skills are as good as my reading ability. Interpret that any way you want.

Re: Super Smash Bros. Roster
Posted: Tue May 06, 2014 4:31 pm
by Tepig2000
Ignoritus wrote:Tepig2000 wrote:
These people didn't post shit, they discussed inteligently how Lip could be unique. And since when does appearing in a successfull game matters? If Sakurai picked characters based on sales the roster would be 80% Mario, 15% Pokemon and 5% Zelda.
Do you know what an asstatistic is?
Hint: It's named after the place you pull it out of.
This doesn't contribute to the discussion and is also very rude, you know. I don't know why you're helping a guy that aparently doesn't know the fu*k he's talking about. Let's discuss something related to Smash Bros.:
So, what do you guys think about Mewtwo's chances? I'd say he's a shoo-in.
Re: Super Smash Bros. Roster
Posted: Tue May 06, 2014 4:35 pm
by Super Luigi!
I don't know about shoo-in, but he's very popular, and I'd like to see him re-join in some way. You know, show off his Mega Evolution and such. Of course, many fans think Mewtwo won't join, on account of Lucario.
Re: Super Smash Bros. Roster
Posted: Tue May 06, 2014 5:07 pm
by Ignoritus
Tepig2000 wrote:
This doesn't contribute to the discussion and is also very rude, you know.
It's not rude. That's what it's called when you make up statistics that are totally invalid.
Tepig2000 wrote:
I don't know why you're helping a guy that aparently doesn't know the fu*k he's talking about.
Well considering you just had to make up fake statistics to support your point (which were also wildly innaccurate), I'd say you shouldn't be accusing other people of not knowing what they're talking about.
Tepig2000 wrote:
So, what do you guys think about Mewtwo's chances? I'd say he's a shoo-in.
Incredibly unlikely. Pokemon already has more representatives than usual, and there are more obvious picks given he lacks relevance currently.
Re: Super Smash Bros. Roster
Posted: Tue May 06, 2014 5:25 pm
by Tepig2000
Ignoritus wrote:Tepig2000 wrote:Tepig2000 wrote:So, what do you guys think about Mewtwo's chances? I'd say he's a shoo-in.
Incredibly unlikely. Pokemon already has more representatives than usual, and there are more obvious picks given he lacks relevance currently.
Pokemon has 4 confirmed characters as of now, and it had 6 in Brawl. And he doesn't lack relevancy. He has two mega evolutions (the only other Pokemon to have two is Charizard, and look what happened to him). He also appears in X and Y. And the most recent Pokemon movie stars him. That's even more relevancy than Lucario and Charizard.
Super Luigi! wrote:I don't know about shoo-in, but he's very popular, and I'd like to see him re-join in some way. You know, show off his Mega Evolution and such. Of course, many fans think Mewtwo won't join, on account of Lucario.
I hope you're not one of these fans, because Lucario has nothing to do with Mewtwo. These fans say Mewtwo and Lucario can't be in because they're too similiar (which is clearly false). Plus Toon Link is in, so this argument is flawed.
Re: Super Smash Bros. Roster
Posted: Tue May 06, 2014 6:33 pm
by Ignoritus
Tepig2000 wrote:
Pokemon has 4 confirmed characters as of now, and it had 6 in Brawl. And he doesn't lack relevancy. He has two mega evolutions (the only other Pokemon to have two is Charizard, and look what happened to him). He also appears in X and Y. And the most recent Pokemon movie stars him. That's even more relevancy than Lucario and Charizard.
Pokemon did not have 6 representatives in Brawl. Having two Mega Evolutions means legitimately nothing. Wow! He appears in X and Y! Just like the other 800 Pokemon! And there's so many Pokemon that have been the stars of movies that did not appear in Smash Bros that the argument kind of falls flat.
Re: Super Smash Bros. Roster
Posted: Tue May 06, 2014 7:05 pm
by Tepig2000
Ignoritus wrote:Tepig2000 wrote:
Pokemon has 4 confirmed characters as of now, and it had 6 in Brawl. And he doesn't lack relevancy. He has two mega evolutions (the only other Pokemon to have two is Charizard, and look what happened to him). He also appears in X and Y. And the most recent Pokemon movie stars him. That's even more relevancy than Lucario and Charizard.
Pokemon did not have 6 representatives in Brawl. Having two Mega Evolutions means legitimately nothing. Wow! He appears in X and Y! Just like the other 800 Pokemon! And there's so many Pokemon that have been the stars of movies that did not appear in Smash Bros that the argument kind of falls flat.
It had 6 in Brawl. Pikachu, Squirtle, Ivysaur, Charizard, Lucario and Jigglypuff. Learn to count. And if Mega Evolutions mean nothing tell me why Lucario is in Smash 4.
Re: Super Smash Bros. Roster
Posted: Tue May 06, 2014 7:47 pm
by Ace
Tepig2000 wrote:Ignoritus wrote:Tepig2000 wrote:
Pokemon has 4 confirmed characters as of now, and it had 6 in Brawl. And he doesn't lack relevancy. He has two mega evolutions (the only other Pokemon to have two is Charizard, and look what happened to him). He also appears in X and Y. And the most recent Pokemon movie stars him. That's even more relevancy than Lucario and Charizard.
Pokemon did not have 6 representatives in Brawl. Having two Mega Evolutions means legitimately nothing. Wow! He appears in X and Y! Just like the other 800 Pokemon! And there's so many Pokemon that have been the stars of movies that did not appear in Smash Bros that the argument kind of falls flat.
It had 6 in Brawl. Pikachu, Squirtle, Ivysaur, Charizard, Lucario and Jigglypuff. Learn to count. And if Mega Evolutions mean nothing tell me why Lucario is in Smash 4.
"Learn to count"
Although there were 6 functional, playable pokemon, the trainer took a spot for three. And since the trianer isn't appearing, it's doubtful that pokemon will
physically take up more than 5 slots (assuming jigglypuff is returning, which is most likely the case).
Re: Super Smash Bros. Roster
Posted: Tue May 06, 2014 8:05 pm
by Tepig2000
Ace wrote:"Learn to count"
Although there were 6 functional, playable pokemon, the trainer took a spot for three. And since the trianer isn't appearing, it's doubtful that pokemon will physically take up more than 5 slots (assuming jigglypuff is returning, which is most likely the case).
The trainer ocuppies one spot in the roster, but it is still 3 characters. It took as much development time to crete Squirtle, Ivysaur and Charizard than it does to create three separate characters. Sakurai has gone throught the work of creating 6 Pokemon characters in Brawl, why would he just suddenly become lazy and include only 4?
That said, I don't have much hope for Squirtle and Ivysaur. But there's still a chance they're in.
Re: Super Smash Bros. Roster
Posted: Tue May 06, 2014 8:15 pm
by Ignoritus
Tepig2000 wrote:
The trainer ocuppies one spot in the roster, but it is still 3 characters. It took as much development time to crete Squirtle, Ivysaur and Charizard than it does to create three separate characters. Sakurai has gone throught the work of creating 6 Pokemon characters in Brawl, why would he just suddenly become lazy and include only 4?
It's not about work, it's about representation. They have limited character slots and they're not going to waste too many on any one franchise.
Tepig2000 wrote:
That said, I don't have much hope for Squirtle and Ivysaur. But there's still a chance they're in.
No, there's actually not. They're not going to have Squirtle AND Greninja. And they're not going to have Ivysaur without Squirtle.
Re: Super Smash Bros. Roster
Posted: Tue May 06, 2014 8:22 pm
by Tepig2000
Ignoritus wrote:No, there's actually not. They're not going to have Squirtle AND Greninja. And they're not going to have Ivysaur without Squirtle.
Cool. I din't know that you could see the future. Please tell me the full roster.
Re: Super Smash Bros. Roster
Posted: Tue May 06, 2014 8:26 pm
by Ignoritus
Tepig2000 wrote:Ignoritus wrote:No, there's actually not. They're not going to have Squirtle AND Greninja. And they're not going to have Ivysaur without Squirtle.
Cool. I din't know that you could see the future. Please tell me the full roster.
Basic logic appears to be fortune telling to you.
That says a lot.
Re: Super Smash Bros. Roster
Posted: Tue May 06, 2014 8:48 pm
by MistakesWereMade
Tepig2000 wrote:Ignoritus wrote:No, there's actually not. They're not going to have Squirtle AND Greninja. And they're not going to have Ivysaur without Squirtle.
Cool. I din't know that you could see the future. Please tell me the full roster.
You have have to be extremely fucking blind to not see the logic there, as it's actually more solid than your dumb claim about mewtwo being in smash because he had 2 megaforms, here, let me explain it carefully so i don't shatter your head:
They're not gonna have 2 water type pokemon, and greninja is already confirmed, so squirtle isn't going to be there.
They're not gonna have ivysaur without squirtle, because it's pointless to have 2 of the 3 gen 1 starters.
There's not going to be a billion characters from a franchise, like we don't have all the koopalings in super smash because there would be more than sufficient mario characters.
And, fuck the other-game logic, here, i could say that phoenix wright can get in ssb, because megaman also got added, and he's from capcom, and PW is also from capcom, not to mention there's a new game coming out, look at this tremendously solid logic!
BTW, i know i'm being rude as fuck, but after a billion pages of dumb and biased speculations, i honestly don't care.
Re: Super Smash Bros. Roster
Posted: Tue May 06, 2014 8:59 pm
by Tepig2000
Ignoritus wrote:Tepig2000 wrote:Ignoritus wrote:No, there's actually not. They're not going to have Squirtle AND Greninja. And they're not going to have Ivysaur without Squirtle.
Cool. I din't know that you could see the future. Please tell me the full roster.
Basic logic appears to be fortune telling to you.
That says a lot.
So, just because you think something is right, it becomes common logic?