The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

For topics related to SuperMarioBrosX.org. Suggest anything that you would like to see on the site here.

Moderator: Userbase Moderators

TLtimelord
Red Yoshi Egg
Red Yoshi Egg
Posts: 2699
Joined: Sat Dec 21, 2013 5:16 pm
Flair: Info under raps

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Postby TLtimelord » Fri Aug 26, 2016 11:04 am

K

We know we have a signature problem when my mobile safari crashes faster on this site than social media sites.

zlaker
Birdo
Birdo
Posts: 2844
Joined: Fri Dec 20, 2013 1:46 pm

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Postby zlaker » Fri Aug 26, 2016 11:11 am

are people proud of having enormous signatures?

Circle Guy
Rocky Wrench
Rocky Wrench
Posts: 645
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 9:25 pm

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Postby Circle Guy » Fri Aug 26, 2016 11:30 am

zlakergirl357 wrote:are people proud of having enormous signatures?
probably

Emral
Cute Yoshi Egg
Cute Yoshi Egg
Posts: 9860
Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 12:58 pm
Flair: Phoenix

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Postby Emral » Fri Aug 26, 2016 1:01 pm

heh.
Image

Zeldamaster12
Cid
Cid
Posts: 4105
Joined: Mon Feb 24, 2014 7:43 pm
Flair: stop looking at my flair dangit

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Postby Zeldamaster12 » Fri Aug 26, 2016 5:13 pm

At least he uses spoilers.

aero
Palom
Palom
Posts: 4787
Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2014 2:51 pm

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Postby aero » Fri Aug 26, 2016 5:20 pm

That's where we're at. Shooting for "at least."

TLtimelord
Red Yoshi Egg
Red Yoshi Egg
Posts: 2699
Joined: Sat Dec 21, 2013 5:16 pm
Flair: Info under raps

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Postby TLtimelord » Fri Aug 26, 2016 5:30 pm

Enjl wrote:heh.
Image
Glad I'm not the only one who noticed.

Circle Guy
Rocky Wrench
Rocky Wrench
Posts: 645
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 9:25 pm

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Postby Circle Guy » Fri Aug 26, 2016 9:26 pm

Enjl wrote:heh.
Image
with the magic of spoilers you can make your sig as big as you want
plus there are 2 youtube videos

Cedur
Raccoon Mario
Raccoon Mario
Posts: 7073
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2016 10:14 am
Flair: I'm gone, for chess and minesweeper
Pronouns: he/him

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Postby Cedur » Sat Aug 27, 2016 12:27 pm

Opening spoilers doesn't count toward the signature's length in this ranking, right?

Circle Guy
Rocky Wrench
Rocky Wrench
Posts: 645
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 9:25 pm

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Postby Circle Guy » Sat Aug 27, 2016 1:19 pm

Supershroom wrote:Opening spoilers doesn't count toward the signature's length in this ranking, right?
No.
If it did, mine would've been on it.

Egg
Snifit
Snifit
Posts: 206
Joined: Sun Jan 26, 2014 6:27 pm

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Postby Egg » Mon Aug 29, 2016 4:19 am

I don't see the problem with big signatures

WindyDelcarlo
Hoopster
Hoopster
Posts: 100
Joined: Sat Apr 12, 2014 7:06 pm

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Postby WindyDelcarlo » Thu Sep 15, 2016 1:17 am

Distracting and unnecessary are two big parts of it.

aero
Palom
Palom
Posts: 4787
Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2014 2:51 pm

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Postby aero » Thu Sep 15, 2016 3:44 am

Story of my life.

Gameinsky
Snifit
Snifit
Posts: 240
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2014 10:59 am

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Postby Gameinsky » Thu Sep 15, 2016 5:33 am

Two other things about them signatures: Very few people actually care to look at the videos, huge images etc. in signatures. They can be funny the first time but all they do afterwards is be a burden as some signatures are so big they don't even fit on my 1920*1080 monitor. (Considering that's reasonably big for a resolution, it's insane that signatures are bigger than that)
I'm thankful that Horikawa has made this thread as quite a few people used spoilers and as a result the forums look a lot more clean.

The signature on Knuckle's forums were worse though *shudders*

Egg
Snifit
Snifit
Posts: 206
Joined: Sun Jan 26, 2014 6:27 pm

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Postby Egg » Fri Sep 16, 2016 8:48 pm

then why put my signature in a spoiler if nobody bothers opening them. I want everyone to see it

TLtimelord
Red Yoshi Egg
Red Yoshi Egg
Posts: 2699
Joined: Sat Dec 21, 2013 5:16 pm
Flair: Info under raps

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Postby TLtimelord » Sat Sep 17, 2016 2:33 am

Gameinsky wrote:Two other things about them signatures: Very few people actually care to look at the videos, huge images etc. in signatures. They can be funny the first time but all they do afterwards is be a burden as some signatures are so big they don't even fit on my 1920*1080 monitor. (Considering that's reasonably big for a resolution, it's insane that signatures are bigger than that)
I'm thankful that Horikawa has made this thread as quite a few people used spoilers and as a result the forums look a lot more clean.

The signature on Knuckle's forums were worse though *shudders*
Quite frankly videos in signatures should be banned.

FireyPaperMario
Wart
Wart
Posts: 6206
Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2014 1:39 pm
Flair: 90's kid born in late 1993 ^_^"
Pronouns: He/Him
Contact:

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Postby FireyPaperMario » Sat Sep 17, 2016 11:56 am

TNTtimelord wrote:
Gameinsky wrote:Two other things about them signatures: Very few people actually care to look at the videos, huge images etc. in signatures. They can be funny the first time but all they do afterwards is be a burden as some signatures are so big they don't even fit on my 1920*1080 monitor. (Considering that's reasonably big for a resolution, it's insane that signatures are bigger than that)
I'm thankful that Horikawa has made this thread as quite a few people used spoilers and as a result the forums look a lot more clean.

The signature on Knuckle's forums were worse though *shudders*
Quite frankly videos in signatures should be banned.
I couldn't agreed more! Signatures should be texts & images. :!: :!: :!:

aero
Palom
Palom
Posts: 4787
Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2014 2:51 pm

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Postby aero » Sat Sep 17, 2016 12:53 pm

Image

Cedur
Raccoon Mario
Raccoon Mario
Posts: 7073
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2016 10:14 am
Flair: I'm gone, for chess and minesweeper
Pronouns: he/him

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Postby Cedur » Sat Sep 17, 2016 12:54 pm

This doesn't work for specific users only. If you could undisplay a specific user's sig (with a click on their profile or something) then we wouldn't have that much of a problem with excessively large signatures.

aero
Palom
Palom
Posts: 4787
Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2014 2:51 pm

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Postby aero » Sat Sep 17, 2016 1:21 pm

Image


Return to “SuperMarioBrosX.org”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests

SMWCentralTalkhausMario Fan Games GalaxyKafukaMarioWikiSMBXEquipoEstelari