Page 66 of 87

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2016 1:21 am
by Zipper
Ah yes, we all should tolerate looking at a giant picture of a mario doll everytime you post, and we're being disrespectful for...not wanting to see that clutter?

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2016 1:39 am
by Egg
Zipper wrote:Ah yes, we all should tolerate looking at a giant picture of a mario doll everytime you post, and we're being disrespectful for...not wanting to see that clutter?
yes

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2016 2:18 am
by aero
I don't see a problem with it if sigs can be disabled.

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2016 2:19 am
by mechamind
Coming soon: Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures - Part II.

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2016 2:21 am
by aero
What for?

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2016 2:21 am
by Egg
mechamind wrote:Coming soon: Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures - Part II.
That is really disrespectful

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2016 2:52 am
by RegisteredUsername
The good old rules that was once used on these forums: http://pastebin.com/G8RjH1Gn

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2016 3:11 am
by Cedur
Just because a few people here have an unnecessarily large Mario image that could be easily resized (rimg tags are a thing) or be put in a spoiler, I should feel forced to disable ALL signatures? It's neither difficult nor it's not part of common sense to keep your sig within a reasonable limit.

In terms of the boss rush, maybe the LJ in question decided to not approve this kind of levels anymore to avoid teasing or otherwise harassing comments and instead they told the author about it through PM, who knows.

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2016 3:14 am
by Egg
Supershroom wrote:Just because a few people here have an unnecessarily large Mario image that could be easily resized (rimg tags are a thing) or be put in a spoiler, I should feel forced to disable ALL signatures? It's neither difficult nor it's not part of common sense to keep your sig within a reasonable limit.

In terms of the boss rush, maybe the LJ in question decided to not approve this kind of levels anymore to avoid teasing or otherwise harassing comments and instead they told the author about it through PM, who knows.
if I put my marios in a spoiler how am I supposed to show it to people

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2016 3:27 am
by Zipper
by clicking the fucking spoiler button

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2016 3:31 am
by Egg
Zipper wrote:by clicking the fucking spoiler button
Well I'm making it easier so you don't need to take your time to click the spoiler button

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2016 3:33 am
by KittyCat
Magibowser wrote:
Zipper wrote:by clicking the fucking spoiler button
Well I'm making it easier so you don't need to take your time to click the spoiler button
Just put it in a spoiler, it's not that hard.

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2016 3:34 am
by aero
I don't think he's getting at the difficulty of putting images in spoilers. It seems to be about presenting Mario.

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2016 3:37 am
by Egg
AeroMatter wrote:I don't think he's getting at the difficulty of putting images in spoilers. It seems to be about presenting Mario.
Exactly, how am I going to show my efforts to bring Mario back to this forum and presenting Mario himself to the newcomers if I bind him to a spoiler?
That is called censure.

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2016 3:53 am
by KittyCat
Magibowser wrote:
AeroMatter wrote:I don't think he's getting at the difficulty of putting images in spoilers. It seems to be about presenting Mario.
Exactly, how am I going to show my efforts to bring Mario back to this forum and presenting Mario himself to the newcomers if I bind him to a spoiler?
That is called censure.

No, it's called premature posting.

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2016 5:42 am
by Emral
[rimg]

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2016 6:43 am
by Panda
Zipper wrote:Ah yes, we all should tolerate looking at a giant picture of a mario doll everytime you post, and we're being disrespectful for...not wanting to see that clutter?
Supershroom wrote:There's actually signatures that cover almost the entirety of my screen
How small is everyone's screens??
I can't believe this is an actual discussion about how inconveniencing a signature is lmao. There have been worse signatures.

If you use adblock you can block the image. Calm down guys.

Plus I find the picture to be oddly charming, the way Mario's crotch seems to merge with his ribs.

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2016 7:04 am
by Mable
Supershroom wrote: In terms of the boss rush, maybe the LJ in question decided to not approve this kind of levels anymore to avoid teasing or otherwise harassing comments and instead they told the author about it through PM, who knows.
If there would be teasing or harassing comments you can simply report those posts to the staff, for example staffs like Pseudo, ZM12 always take care of posts like these or some other level judge could go ahead.
I don't agree that a LJ alone should decide to immediatly disapprove it and delete it though.

Oh? Did i interrupt this amazing discussion about a big mario image? How sad,

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2016 7:42 am
by PixelPest
Tinkerbell wrote:
Supershroom wrote: In terms of the boss rush, maybe the LJ in question decided to not approve this kind of levels anymore to avoid teasing or otherwise harassing comments and instead they told the author about it through PM, who knows.
If there would be teasing or harassing comments you can simply report those posts to the staff, for example staffs like Pseudo, ZM12 always take care of posts like these or some other level judge could go ahead.
I don't agree that a LJ alone should decide to immediatly disapprove it and delete it though.
If it was that "First episode of a new member" by tusms1, yes, I was the one who deleted it, no I have nothing against boss rushes. Due to the post not having screenshots, I deleted the post, sent it to the user via PM, and told them that they cab repost it when they have screenshots. That's the way it's supposed to work in the Levels, Projects, and Episodes forums when the main post doesn't follow the rules. Exceptions to this are older topics where the screenshots or download link are broken, or when there are a lot of posts by users already that are constructive. I'm pretty sure this method was implemented to reduce the clutter of locked topics, since very few of them actually get unlocked

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2016 7:55 am
by Cedur
That's a pretty nice decision on handling posts missing screenshots / download links, thumbs up.