Site Discussion Thread

For topics related to SuperMarioBrosX.org. Suggest anything that you would like to see on the site here.

Moderator: Userbase Moderators

Zipper
Ripper II
Ripper II
Posts: 354
Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2015 11:31 am
Contact:

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Postby Zipper » Wed Jul 27, 2016 1:21 am

Ah yes, we all should tolerate looking at a giant picture of a mario doll everytime you post, and we're being disrespectful for...not wanting to see that clutter?

Egg
Snifit
Snifit
Posts: 206
Joined: Sun Jan 26, 2014 6:27 pm

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Postby Egg » Wed Jul 27, 2016 1:39 am

Zipper wrote:Ah yes, we all should tolerate looking at a giant picture of a mario doll everytime you post, and we're being disrespectful for...not wanting to see that clutter?
yes

aero
Palom
Palom
Posts: 4787
Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2014 2:51 pm

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Postby aero » Wed Jul 27, 2016 2:18 am

I don't see a problem with it if sigs can be disabled.

mechamind
Eerie
Eerie
Posts: 784
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2015 9:56 pm
Flair: You can set your mind to it!
Pronouns: He/Him/His

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Postby mechamind » Wed Jul 27, 2016 2:19 am

Coming soon: Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures - Part II.

aero
Palom
Palom
Posts: 4787
Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2014 2:51 pm

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Postby aero » Wed Jul 27, 2016 2:21 am

What for?

Egg
Snifit
Snifit
Posts: 206
Joined: Sun Jan 26, 2014 6:27 pm

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Postby Egg » Wed Jul 27, 2016 2:21 am

mechamind wrote:Coming soon: Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures - Part II.
That is really disrespectful

RegisteredUsername
Tweeter
Tweeter
Posts: 137
Joined: Thu May 21, 2015 9:24 pm

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Postby RegisteredUsername » Wed Jul 27, 2016 2:52 am

The good old rules that was once used on these forums: http://pastebin.com/G8RjH1Gn

Cedur
Link
Link
Posts: 7073
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2016 10:14 am
Flair: I'm gone, for chess and minesweeper
Pronouns: he/him

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Postby Cedur » Wed Jul 27, 2016 3:11 am

Just because a few people here have an unnecessarily large Mario image that could be easily resized (rimg tags are a thing) or be put in a spoiler, I should feel forced to disable ALL signatures? It's neither difficult nor it's not part of common sense to keep your sig within a reasonable limit.

In terms of the boss rush, maybe the LJ in question decided to not approve this kind of levels anymore to avoid teasing or otherwise harassing comments and instead they told the author about it through PM, who knows.

Egg
Snifit
Snifit
Posts: 206
Joined: Sun Jan 26, 2014 6:27 pm

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Postby Egg » Wed Jul 27, 2016 3:14 am

Supershroom wrote:Just because a few people here have an unnecessarily large Mario image that could be easily resized (rimg tags are a thing) or be put in a spoiler, I should feel forced to disable ALL signatures? It's neither difficult nor it's not part of common sense to keep your sig within a reasonable limit.

In terms of the boss rush, maybe the LJ in question decided to not approve this kind of levels anymore to avoid teasing or otherwise harassing comments and instead they told the author about it through PM, who knows.
if I put my marios in a spoiler how am I supposed to show it to people

Zipper
Ripper II
Ripper II
Posts: 354
Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2015 11:31 am
Contact:

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Postby Zipper » Wed Jul 27, 2016 3:27 am

by clicking the fucking spoiler button

Egg
Snifit
Snifit
Posts: 206
Joined: Sun Jan 26, 2014 6:27 pm

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Postby Egg » Wed Jul 27, 2016 3:31 am

Zipper wrote:by clicking the fucking spoiler button
Well I'm making it easier so you don't need to take your time to click the spoiler button

KittyCat
Buster Beetle
Buster Beetle
Posts: 81
Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2016 6:04 am

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Postby KittyCat » Wed Jul 27, 2016 3:33 am

Magibowser wrote:
Zipper wrote:by clicking the fucking spoiler button
Well I'm making it easier so you don't need to take your time to click the spoiler button
Just put it in a spoiler, it's not that hard.

aero
Palom
Palom
Posts: 4787
Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2014 2:51 pm

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Postby aero » Wed Jul 27, 2016 3:34 am

I don't think he's getting at the difficulty of putting images in spoilers. It seems to be about presenting Mario.

Egg
Snifit
Snifit
Posts: 206
Joined: Sun Jan 26, 2014 6:27 pm

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Postby Egg » Wed Jul 27, 2016 3:37 am

AeroMatter wrote:I don't think he's getting at the difficulty of putting images in spoilers. It seems to be about presenting Mario.
Exactly, how am I going to show my efforts to bring Mario back to this forum and presenting Mario himself to the newcomers if I bind him to a spoiler?
That is called censure.

KittyCat
Buster Beetle
Buster Beetle
Posts: 81
Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2016 6:04 am

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Postby KittyCat » Wed Jul 27, 2016 3:53 am

Magibowser wrote:
AeroMatter wrote:I don't think he's getting at the difficulty of putting images in spoilers. It seems to be about presenting Mario.
Exactly, how am I going to show my efforts to bring Mario back to this forum and presenting Mario himself to the newcomers if I bind him to a spoiler?
That is called censure.

No, it's called premature posting.

Emral
Cute Yoshi Egg
Cute Yoshi Egg
Posts: 9890
Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 12:58 pm
Flair: Phoenix

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Postby Emral » Wed Jul 27, 2016 5:42 am

[rimg]

Panda
Purple Yoshi Egg
Purple Yoshi Egg
Posts: 414
Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2014 6:35 pm
Flair: 1453 worst year of life
Pronouns: she/her

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Postby Panda » Wed Jul 27, 2016 6:43 am

Zipper wrote:Ah yes, we all should tolerate looking at a giant picture of a mario doll everytime you post, and we're being disrespectful for...not wanting to see that clutter?
Supershroom wrote:There's actually signatures that cover almost the entirety of my screen
How small is everyone's screens??
I can't believe this is an actual discussion about how inconveniencing a signature is lmao. There have been worse signatures.

If you use adblock you can block the image. Calm down guys.

Plus I find the picture to be oddly charming, the way Mario's crotch seems to merge with his ribs.

Mable
Luigi
Luigi
Posts: 5806
Joined: Sat Dec 21, 2013 4:23 am
Contact:

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Postby Mable » Wed Jul 27, 2016 7:04 am

Supershroom wrote: In terms of the boss rush, maybe the LJ in question decided to not approve this kind of levels anymore to avoid teasing or otherwise harassing comments and instead they told the author about it through PM, who knows.
If there would be teasing or harassing comments you can simply report those posts to the staff, for example staffs like Pseudo, ZM12 always take care of posts like these or some other level judge could go ahead.
I don't agree that a LJ alone should decide to immediatly disapprove it and delete it though.

Oh? Did i interrupt this amazing discussion about a big mario image? How sad,

PixelPest
Link
Link
Posts: 7111
Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2015 5:38 pm
Flair: Tamer of Boom Booms
Contact:

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Postby PixelPest » Wed Jul 27, 2016 7:42 am

Tinkerbell wrote:
Supershroom wrote: In terms of the boss rush, maybe the LJ in question decided to not approve this kind of levels anymore to avoid teasing or otherwise harassing comments and instead they told the author about it through PM, who knows.
If there would be teasing or harassing comments you can simply report those posts to the staff, for example staffs like Pseudo, ZM12 always take care of posts like these or some other level judge could go ahead.
I don't agree that a LJ alone should decide to immediatly disapprove it and delete it though.
If it was that "First episode of a new member" by tusms1, yes, I was the one who deleted it, no I have nothing against boss rushes. Due to the post not having screenshots, I deleted the post, sent it to the user via PM, and told them that they cab repost it when they have screenshots. That's the way it's supposed to work in the Levels, Projects, and Episodes forums when the main post doesn't follow the rules. Exceptions to this are older topics where the screenshots or download link are broken, or when there are a lot of posts by users already that are constructive. I'm pretty sure this method was implemented to reduce the clutter of locked topics, since very few of them actually get unlocked

Cedur
Link
Link
Posts: 7073
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2016 10:14 am
Flair: I'm gone, for chess and minesweeper
Pronouns: he/him

Re: Site Discussion Thread

Postby Cedur » Wed Jul 27, 2016 7:55 am

That's a pretty nice decision on handling posts missing screenshots / download links, thumbs up.


Return to “SuperMarioBrosX.org”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests

SMWCentralTalkhausMario Fan Games GalaxyKafukaMarioWikiSMBXEquipoEstelari