Super Mario Bros. X Forums

migueeel wrote:

KittyCat wrote:blablablabla

Just do whatever the fuck you want to do. Don't like 2.0, and want to play 1.4? Then do! Noone's pinning you around.
If you want to debate madly on TeaScript vs LunaLua, then go make a thread.
I'm getting tired too of having to change my bookmarks every day because of your little war of repetitive arguments, which are just "Lunalua is a hack of SMBX, that's bad, it sucks, it's unofficial, so obviously 1.4 is better".

We have a whole engine that is going to be expanded on more stuff than just Mario.

So yeah, go take your war somewhere else, this is the Open Beta discussion and we only want to hear about Horikawa getting better and 2.0 beta 3 coming out.

Prado wrote:Quick tutorial for people who dislikes 2.0:

Don't download it;

Don't play it;

Don't be rude with who likes 2.0;

Don't spam 2.0 thread with arguments of why something is better than 2.0;

It works for other games as well.

KittyCat wrote: Hey you little kids, I never said I hate SMBX 2.0.

KittyCat wrote: God, no wonder the "MarioHeads really dislike you. You're being as much of a pest as you are to them.

migueeel wrote:

KittyCat wrote: Hey you little kids, I never said I hate SMBX 2.0.

KittyCat wrote: God, no wonder the "MarioHeads really dislike you. You're being as much of a pest as you are to them.

Yet you've been insulting us and never had a decent argument on why 1.4 is superior to 2.0 which just dragged on a dumb discussion.

KittyCat wrote:

migueeel wrote:

KittyCat wrote: Hey you little kids, I never said I hate SMBX 2.0.

KittyCat wrote: God, no wonder the "MarioHeads really dislike you. You're being as much of a pest as you are to them.

Yet you've been insulting us and never had a decent argument on why 1.4 is superior to 2.0 which just dragged on a dumb discussion.

Who's "us"? - If you could properly read, I was aiming that at Pixel Pest himself.

No wonder people get insulted or angry so easily on the Internet.
I mean come on people, stop taking insults in that isn't aimed at you!
...Or better yet. Learn how to read properly before you start using the Internet.

NinGamer wrote:What's the problem with SMBX 2.0.? Can someone explain? Did a feature get deleted or something? Is it really so bad?

NinGamer wrote:What's the problem with SMBX 2.0.? Can someone explain? Did a feature get deleted or something? Is it really so bad?

NinGamer wrote:What's the problem with SMBX 2.0.? Can someone explain? Did a feature get deleted or something? Is it really so bad?

SnifitGuy wrote:Can somebody explain to me plz how new features are added? If the source files themselves are not being altered, is it .dlls and other files that add lines of code to the game or what. I'm curious as to how (probably already asked this question, dont remember the answer if given).

SnifitGuy wrote:

Willhart wrote:

SnifitGuy wrote:Can somebody explain to me plz how new features are added? If the source files themselves are not being altered, is it .dlls and other files that add lines of code to the game or what. I'm curious as to how (probably already asked this question, dont remember the answer if given).

Plan is to keep things as close to being native smbx as possible.

So basically it's just automating the LunaLua process to the point where it is seamlessly incorporated into the SMBX game?

ScatLover wrote:

NinGamer wrote:What's the problem with SMBX 2.0.? Can someone explain? Did a feature get deleted or something? Is it really so bad?

It's an absolute pointless project that no one wanted, except the circle-jerk here.
Also, it's never getting finished. It was supposed to be done around a year ago, but it's in development hell and will never get done.
Not that it matters, no one is going to use it, except the very small circle-jerk group that will masturbate and jizz out shitty "content" no one asked for, wants or needs anyways.
It's amazing how much resources and content we've lost because of focusing on this dead-on-arrival project.

ScatLover wrote:

NinGamer wrote: This the first and only post you've made in this forum! Did you join to offend people? Also, how do you know everything about SMBX if you joined the website today?

I have made thousands of posts here. My former account was banned for speaking the truth as well. This will also most likely be banned.

ScatLover wrote:

NinGamer wrote: but nah gotta be dem nazimods

No one should be banned for expressing their opinion. So yes, nazi mods.

ScatLover wrote: Hypocrite much? I made a calm, nice post explaining everything, and you decided to be a douche back.
Sure you're not a mod?

ScatLover wrote:

NinGamer wrote:What's the problem with SMBX 2.0.? Can someone explain? Did a feature get deleted or something? Is it really so bad?

It's an absolute pointless project that no one wanted, except the circle-jerk here.
Also, it's never getting finished. It was supposed to be done around a year ago, but it's in development hell and will never get done.
Not that it matters, no one is going to use it, except the very small circle-jerk group that will masturbate and jizz out shitty "content" no one asked for, wants or needs anyways.
It's amazing how much resources and content we've lost because of focusing on this dead-on-arrival project.

ScatLover wrote:

NinGamer wrote: but nah gotta be dem nazimods

No one should be banned for expressing their opinion. So yes, nazi mods. Try to even give a hint at constructive criticism, and you will be banned.
Suggest better features, you will be banned.
Even hint at the direction they're taking has been wrong from the very start, and you'll be banned.

"2.0" isn't only redundant, it's a disaster. It's in development hell with no passion. It's delayed by almost a year, a project that was supposed to take only a couple of months.
Why? Because there's no dedication. Just excuses and implementation of features no one wants so the circle-jerk group can masturbate over how awesome they are at implementing things no one wants.

It's a disaster from start to finish, and no one wants it.

ScatLover wrote:

NinGamer wrote: You can express your opinion as long as it doesn't involve you being an ass.
Eh just get out of here, you're wasting your time.

He said, being an ass himself.
Hypocrite much? I made a calm, nice post explaining everything, and you decided to be a douche back.
Sure you're not a mod?

NinGamer wrote:

ScatLover wrote:

NinGamer wrote: You can express your opinion as long as it doesn't involve you being an ass.
Eh just get out of here, you're wasting your time.

He said, being an ass himself.
Hypocrite much? I made a calm, nice post explaining everything, and you decided to be a douche back.
Sure you're not a mod?

I didn't say that, for the last time! It was Spinder! I would never call people asses...

ScatLover wrote: Hypocrite much? I made a calm, nice post explaining everything, and you decided to be a douche back.

Just excuses and implementation of features no one wants so the circle-jerk group can masturbate over how awesome they are at implementing things no one wants.

It's a disaster from start to finish, and no one wants it.

Not that it matters, no one is going to use it, except the very small circle-jerk group that will masturbate and jizz out shitty "content" no one asked for, wants or needs anyways.