Page 7 of 9

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Posted: Mon Apr 04, 2016 7:40 am
by Cedrik
Camacho wrote:
Cedrik wrote:Super Mario Channel has the biggest I ever see!!!!!!!
I suggest you check this account.
I do.

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Posted: Mon Apr 04, 2016 11:42 am
by Mable
Camacho wrote:
Cedrik wrote:Super Mario Channel has the biggest I ever see!!!!!!!
I suggest you check this account.
Accounts like that don't count, they only made to make 1 posts and never get used again.

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Posted: Mon Apr 04, 2016 7:05 pm
by HenryRichard
I'm kinda left wondering who has the longest signature with the spoilers shown. Some are insanely long (like over 3 full screens).

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Posted: Tue Apr 05, 2016 12:06 am
by PopYoshi
Uhh, okay, I tried to make my signature smaller, now is bigger than before X_X

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Posted: Tue Apr 05, 2016 12:26 am
by Alagirez
Pop Yoshi Bros wrote:Uhh, okay, I tried to make my signature smaller, now is bigger than before X_X
I think you need to spoiler the bcbgmaxblahblah thing and the yoshi thing.

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Posted: Tue Apr 05, 2016 8:04 am
by TDK
Tinkerbell wrote:
Camacho wrote:
Cedrik wrote:Super Mario Channel has the biggest I ever see!!!!!!!
I suggest you check this account.
Accounts like that don't count, they only made to make 1 posts and never get used again.
I'm sure half of the users in the list made less than 5 posts.
Actually some of them made zero post.

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Posted: Tue Apr 05, 2016 8:12 am
by Cedrik
TheDinoKing432 wrote:
Tinkerbell wrote:
Accounts like that don't count, they only made to make 1 posts and never get used again.
I'm sure half of the users in the list made less than 5 posts.
Actually some of them made zero post.
Place 19 ... lol!

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Posted: Tue Apr 05, 2016 8:51 am
by Mable
Haha yeah funny or?... noo

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Posted: Thu Apr 14, 2016 9:58 pm
by CynicHost
Updated my signature... I should now be way lower.

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Posted: Thu Apr 14, 2016 11:26 pm
by 4matsy
Pfft. :p

Everybody knows my sig is best sig. :3

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Posted: Fri Apr 15, 2016 1:16 pm
by The Thwomp King
MightyMerlinStyle wrote:Updated my signature... I should now be way lower.
I'll miss your support. XP hahaha

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Posted: Tue Apr 19, 2016 7:45 pm
by icemario12
Well then. I guess I'm offended AND proud. Hold it there a sec...there, I added you to my to kill to respect list.

In all seriousness though, I appreciate the time and effort you spent doing this. It's the little things like these that keep you going.

P.S.: I won't change my signature anytime soon, so deal with it.
#noregrets

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2016 12:04 pm
by HunnyBon
I come back from a hiatus and suddenly I see my signature on here, might aswell fix my large screenspace devouring signature :lol:

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2016 7:42 pm
by Dr Luigi
Wow, I never been on this site for months and I get the worst signature. Oh well lol

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2016 4:59 pm
by TheRulerOfOats
I'm 3?! Oh dear oh dear, I'll change my signature right away!

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Posted: Wed Jul 06, 2016 4:55 pm
by The Enoch
I deserve to be in here.

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Posted: Thu Jul 07, 2016 6:24 am
by MECHDRAGON777
HenryRichard wrote:I'm kinda left wondering who has the longest signature with the spoilers shown. Some are insanely long (like over 3 full screens).
I think that would go to me actually...

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Posted: Thu Jul 07, 2016 10:46 pm
by Alagirez
MECHDRAGON777 wrote:
HenryRichard wrote:I'm kinda left wondering who has the longest signature with the spoilers shown. Some are insanely long (like over 3 full screens).
I think that would go to me actually...
Probably mine :P but idk

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2016 3:39 am
by MECHDRAGON777
Camacho wrote:
MECHDRAGON777 wrote:
HenryRichard wrote:I'm kinda left wondering who has the longest signature with the spoilers shown. Some are insanely long (like over 3 full screens).
I think that would go to me actually...
Probably mine :P but idk
On a phone, yours is 1,87 screens tall, and mine is 1,5 screens tall.

Re: The Top 100 Scientifically WORST Signatures on SMBX Forums

Posted: Tue Aug 23, 2016 7:06 pm
by Spark
Well, at least I'm 91st haha