Harvey36Dice wrote:i have some question for MECHY777's review.
MECHDRAGON'S REVIEW wrote:NOTE: walking eeries
what happened with them lol?
MECHDRAGON'S REVIEW wrote:-random flying shell is random
I didn't see any RANDOM SHELLS in my level.
MECHDRAGON'S REVIEW wrote:-Wintry Hybrid ripoff
WHAT do you MEAN?!?!?
MECHDRAGON'S REVIEW wrote:NOTE: Pipe disappearing is random
What do you mean?
MECHDRAGON'S REVIEW wrote:NOTE: multicolored coins
is that WRONG if i used multicolored coins???
MECHDRAGON'S REVIEW wrote:NOTE: Tanooki suits will cause invisible blocks to show
You must used "needatanookisuit" cheat code when you playing my level.
MECHDRAGON'S REVIEW wrote:-no checkpoint
Then why PixelPest and TTK found the checkpoint?
other than : i accepted these errors in my level.
If I said note, it is something that stood out to me, but did not go with a plus or minus.
I will state the reason for each minus:
A. All three times I played your level, was hit by a shell that came on screen from a slope, staying in the air actually made a painful impact.
B. You used a gimmick in the exact same way in your visual contest. The same thing that caused cutoff.
C. The Thwomp King told me their was a checkpoint, but I beat it without ever seeing one.
D. On the note that I mentioned bringing a Tanooki suit, I never used a cheat, you can ask The Thwomp King yourself. I actually looked in the editor for the secret star, but saw that block.
Also, next time I do a textual review, I will ask the person to take the notes Verbatim I guess. i should also state I should of proof-read the list more carefully!
I do appreciate the level, but when Prox said I memorized where the platform was, I see judging as breaking the level or trying to break it at our best. Testing every possible situation. In your level, before jumping down their, I actually verbally said a player would get stuck, and the cit off was what I saw while double checking. It is always better to make sure that if that happens,you either kill the play instantly for falling, or make it so they can get back up.
Also, as for Prox, I was not being biased at all, no matter how hard it may look. I was looking for things to take of for in his level. Not a single positive was I looking for. The things about the enemies being ice proof was me checking to see if it made since. (Penguin is immune to ice, and the chain chomp being immune to ice makes it so you can not carry it and cause cutoff with the chain) I will admit, I should taken of for the Fliperous not being ice proof though. I actually played his level with Toad, so I never really have any reason to get backlash on that.
On Supermario12345's level, it is one of the best levels I have seen from him, however, I found the story fun. Some of the things in it though are unorthodox though, such as the bees replacing rippers to mess with a power-up, or a herb to blok a pipe and long line riders.
The way I judged this contest is actually be playing the level over Skype screen share and I asked The Thwomp King to type out the notes I said. Originally, the notes were me t to be for him; then, it got ti the point of random things ghat stood out. I am sorry for any commotion and I hope you all can see why I prefer video judging. I hope my compute gets to the point where I can record again (my computer has been having issues with all programs lately), so sorry for the inconvince. (However you spell <in-co-vin-yance>)
Edit: andialifbatara: why are you upset I gave you what you think is a low score when you got a 5,9 when that is my third highest this contes and you made third? ...also, their is the fact that I consider anything above 5,7 a good score. On top of that, without my reviews, you would of placed at third! My reviews did not effect the top three from what I see. My score may have even boosted you from lower to third. (I can not check with a calculator at this time.)
Prox: just for the record, some of the thing in the review, I do not even remember saying...