|
||||
We need change.
Moderator: Userbase Moderators
Re: We need change.$5 Joey did NOT demote him because he finally discovered it was a good idea to demote inactive staff but instead demoted him because Kley asked to be demoted.
Last edited by reghrhre on Tue Mar 03, 2015 5:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
||
Re: We need change.where's my money huh
|
||
Re: We need change.Kley did actually ask to be demoted (to some extent), though Joey also made the decision based on his behavior in an IRC conversation this morning and general inactivity.
|
||
Re: We need change.for those wondering about that irc conversation <Kley> Users need to stop acting so entitled and stop patronizing the staff, thinking they can say whatever they want to us and push us around <Kley> nothing is more aggravating than users who think they can say and do whatever. <LudwigVonKoopa> yer right mate <Ragont> Kley: This is not how a moderator should act regardless http://www.smbxgame.com/forums/v ... 45#p125845 <Kley> Oh god shut up lol <Kley> I really don't care what you have to say <Ragont> ur a complete fucking child <Ragont> no wonder no one likes u LMAO * You are now known as ragont * Kley is now crying <Kley> QQ <Kley> Lol, as if you're really hurting my feeling or really care if i get the approval of a couple of kids |
||
Re: We need change.Oh wow, a moderator telling someone to shut up for pointing out him being rude to another member for bumping a month old thread just to say that something was stupid.
A+ |
||
Re: We need change.Let's not start a witch-hunt against Kley here, folks. He's already been demoted.
|
||
Re: We need change.Calling your user base kids is a really poor way of going around things. It's just going to anger people more.
From what I've observed, the staff team have a tendency to deal with situations in the worst way possible or at least in a way that is totally unnecessary and could be dealt with easier. |
||
Re: We need change.ok guys kley got demoted lets not actually use him as an example since he's not staff anymore
|
||
Re: We need change.Should we go with your style of moderation instead, Knux? |
||
Re: We need change.Isn't that taking it a bit too far? |
||
Re: We need change.Is that Palisade guy Knux?
|
||
Re: We need change.GhostHawk has acquired evidence that he might be Knux, yes.
|
||
Re: We need change.As far as I'm aware Knux left and stopped trying two months ago, I highly doubt it's him. |
||
Re: We need change.and the fact that he may be knux is irrelevant as it has nothing to do with his point.
|
||
Re: We need change.While I generally agree with you, let's remember that Knux also appeared to leave and "stop trying" for several months after he deleted his forum back in August. But yes, qig does make a good point. Whether it's Knux or not doesn't really affect the validity of his argument. |
||
Re: We need change.Well this got derailed fast.
Anyway, I think this thread has kind of served its purpose now that there has been a change in staff. Does anyone object to this? |
||
Re: We need change.Demoting one person =/= full change in staff. We still only have one active administrator, something needs to be done about that, as things need to be done on this forum still. |
||
Re: We need change.u ahve to be mad ignorant if u think the only problem was kley LMAO |
||
Re: We need change.I don't think the purpose was to make a small change in staff. There are still issues that are being discussed, not just moderation inactivity.
|
||
Re: We need change.Well yes, however Valtteri has been more active as of late which is why I think enough changes have been made. That is unless you want to go after Quill in which case I wouldn't be able to support you on since he has been around more than Kley lately. Sure I think he isn't doing as much on the forums as I've said before, but it's not at the point where he needs a thread for his replacement. |
||
Return to “SuperMarioBrosX.org”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest
