Super Mario Bros. X Forums

Zeldamaster12 wrote:

Nickname wrote:Safety votes won't count from now on. Please vote for a player every day or at least show some activity.

Why? Just because Joey doesn't like it? What the hell are we supposed to do when there's literally zero evidence against anyone? Just vote for someone completely random without any evidence whatsoever?

Look at the original rules. Safety votes have beem used in some game and then carried on from there on. Joey is right, Safety votes are against the original rules. And since Safety votes have just been implemented in some game anyways and have been taken as granted afterwards, I'll remove Safety votes also bc of personal preference. You don't evem have to vote, you can just say who you suspect and you won't risk a phantom.

I thought daily lynches were mandatory. Also, if I may add, TNT and Igno, two mods, have participated in Mafia and haven't said anything against Safety lynching, so I didn't know that.

Not voting does risk a phantom. I know that "phantoms" have never been clearly defined, but you do have to vote.

Zeldamaster12: You're supposed to find evidence.

Anyway, I was silenced during the last phase and couldn't voice my opinions on what was going on.

Joey wrote:Zeldamaster12: You're supposed to find evidence.

You're not always going to have evidence, no matter how hard you try.

oops not have, i meant find

I was never that big on Safety votes. I'm kinda glad they're not allowed anymore.

Please come to the IRC if you can, guys!!!

Zeldamaster12 wrote:

Joey wrote:Zeldamaster12: You're supposed to find evidence.

You're not always going to have evidence, no matter how hard you try.

Did you try, though?

Joey wrote:Please come to the IRC if you can, guys!!!

Every time I do, it's barren.

Joey wrote:Did you try, though?

I don't see how you can find barely any evidence on Night 1, and the whole entire Day phase, I was at school. I saw that Igno said that Nien was Redigit, so I voted, then the day ended almost instantly.

Okay, so the real problem was that you were at school.

Also, since each townsperson role is different, I'm going to claim Blueoak. Counterclaims welcome!!!

fucking
wasnt igno the one who said we should wait for the lynch target to say something in their defense before they get ripped?

Nien, you're dead already.

Zeldamaster12 wrote:Nien, you're dead already.

which is my point, i got lynched off and i didn't get the chance to say anything because i was away, there was a rule for that implemented in one mafia game iirc.

There was talk about it in either M1 or M2 but we may not have reached a definitive conclusion - and even if we did, I think the circumstances may be different. And even if they weren't, those game threads are gone anyway.

What does that have to do with Nien being able to post while dead?

The point is that we discussed the "no insta until that player has posted" rule back in M1. Nien was insta'd before being able to post, so that's why he was concerned.

Oh, I see. Thanks for clearing that up.

OK guys, I read the thread and there's really not much to discuss.
The only things worth reading were probably that

A) Igno was right about Nien
B) Joe claimed Blueoak

OK, Redigit is already dead, that's good. Sorry I didn't vote, the day went by while I was offline. I'm actually still active.

Joey wrote:The point is that we discussed the "no insta until that player has posted" rule back in M1. Nien was insta'd before being able to post, so that's why he was concerned.

To make this clear to anyone who hasn't seen it (especially @Nickname since he's the game host), lynchings may not end until the target of the lynch gets one final chance to argue for themselves. If they give up in this chance, they will be instant lynched. If people change votes afterward, then obviously they aren't killed immediately.

This will be added to the rules topic as well as a clarification on safety votes.